Monthly Archives: May 2007

Another Contract Soon to be Ratified

EMU, 2nd-largest union agree on contract
Regents must OK 4-year pact; they meet June 19

Friday, May 25, 2007
BY GEOFF LARCOM
News Staff Reporter
Eastern Michigan University and the union that represents its professional, technical and office workers have reached agreement on a four-year contract.
 
The union voted this week to approve the agreement 139-74, said Dave Wilcox, president of UAW Local 1976.
Terms of the agreement include a retroactive raise of $1,260 for this year, dating back to last July 1. Workers will receive a raise of $1,406 for this coming year, the academic year 2007-08, and $1,563 for the third year of the contract, said Dave Trakul, director of employee relations for EMU. The final year will provide a 3 percent raise.
The agreement also includes new medical benefit language, which goes into effect Jan. 1. Employees may choose one of two options, one that involves cost-sharing and one that doesn’t.
“I’m pleased that it passed,” Wilcox said. “We’re trying to make (the contract) work for our membership, and I think it did. … I feel we’re doing the right thing for our membership, especially in these tough economic times.”

 

http://www.mlive.com/news/aanews/index.ssf?/base/news-22/1180104371306140.xml&coll=2

Thefts on campus — thoughts after a faculty meeting with Stroh & Simpkins

Some thoughts after the CAC meeting on 5/24, with guests Janice Stroh, Karen Simpkins present to talk about security on campus, the master key ring, and thefts from academic buildings. This is not a report on the meeting.

The administration seems paralyzed in dealing with the rash of thefts on campus beyond exhorting the community that “everyone is responsible for security” and that administration is planning on paying a consulting firm to do a comprehensive analysis of EMU’s security in the near future. Oh, and the purchase of the “lo-jack” for laptops (I forget the name of the system). (Why a perp couldn’t change the BIOS settings to boot from CD, reformat the disk, then install a new OS, I don’t know. It’s what I would do if I were a bad guy and wanted the laptop for myself. Or just pawn it a hundred miles away and caveat emptor.)

My perception of the reason for the administration paralysis is that 1) they don’t know whether the theft of the master key ring is actually involved in the current thefts, 2) if it is the master key ring that’s involved, then the cost of rekeying all campus doors seems prohibitive, 3) no apparent pattern in the thefts. At least they say that they have analyzed the data for patterns, but their manner of delivering that statement did not fill me with confidence. Also, don’t forget, friends, that
administration did spend $900K on security in response to the theft of the master key ring and look at where we are now.

Continue reading

What’s in a credit hour?

Everyone, excepting faculty and a few academic administrators, may be surprised to learn that we have very few (basically, no) general policies on majors and minors (the courses and prerequisite structures) at EMU. The question of standards has been largely left to departments. I believe this is the common procedure across all universities, especially those in the top and middle tier. Curricula grow almost organically out of the historical precedents of the departments from which professors were graduated and the intellectual culture of the discipline.

It’s a good set-up, probably, and has worked reasonably well for, oh, 700 years or so. Still, there are problems.

Continue reading

Master Keys in the News

There have been a number of news articles about the master keys lately, but so far very little real action on the part of the administration to improve the situation or to warn staff and faculty of the ongoing vulnerability of locked spaces to burglary, or much worse.
 
 

The article and editorial in the Echo are, as usual, very good.  The first is “Master Keys Lost,” by Amanda Hamon, Editor in Chief:
http://www.easternecho.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?11809
 
 

The second, the editorial, is “EMU Should Prioritize Safety“:
http://www.easternecho.com/cgi-bin/story.cgi?31749
 

 
The Detroit Free Press also has an article, “At EMU, Missing Keys are Problem” by Kristen Jordan Shamus:
http://www.freep.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070524/NEWS06/705240389
 

 

This article also has a copy of the grievance now being filed by the AAUP against Janice Stroh on behalf of professors:
http://www.freep.com/assets/static/pdf/2007/05/keys0524.pdf
 

 

Some more discussion of this issue has been added to the earlier emutalk post, “Update on Master Keys and Office Larcenies“:
 

http://emutalk.org/?p=324
 

 

I hear that a vote of no confidence has been called on the dean and that the administration threatens to disband the Security Advisory Committee, the only such committee with faculty, staff, and student representation. 
 

 

It is not reassuring how very little seriously the administration takes security just when it has become of so much importance to everyone else due to the severe, recurring security lapses at our university like the stolen master keys.

“Trial under way for EMU rape suspect”

From the AA News, “Trial under way for EMU rape suspect.” Of course, this is not the same case as the current Orange Taylor case regarding the Dickinson murder. I had kind of forgotten about this case and the circumstances for why James Holland Jr. was being charged with rape and a series of other crimes around EMU and Ypsilanti in 2005. Basically, Taylor (oops– I meant Holland) confessed to these crimes while in jail for an attempted murder for something else.

Krause’s/sitedad’s Presentation about EMUtalk.org

As I have mentioned a couple of times before, I gave a presentation recently (Sunday, actually) where I talked about EMUtalk.org. The conference was the annual Computers and Writing conference, this year hosted at Wayne State University. My presentation was titled “Situation, Exigence, and Blogging: The EMU-AAUP Faculty Strike of 2006 and The Birth of EMUtalk.org” and

it is available at this web site with three basic versions:

  • the script of my talk with a few key slides pictures included (the version I’d recommend for most readers);
  • just the script with numbers where I inserted the slides; and
  • the Keynote slides saved for the web.

Obviously, I’d be curious to find out what people here think.  And I also would be curious to find out what people think about some of the questions I raise at the end of these presentation.  Let me quote those last sentences here:

One of the benefits from this (meaning this study I’m starting), I hope, is to learn more about how to make EMUTalk.org a more productive  forum.  Like I said, I think that EMUTalk.org has been largely productive and positive, but I am concerned about its future.  As the moderator/sitedad of the forum, what role should I take  in encouraging participation without censoring those who are already invested in the site?  How does the site become a space to promote the positive things about EMU and less an opportunity to whine and to host a pity party, and yet maintain itself as an important outlet to point out real problems and to simply vent frustrations?  Is it possible to “change the toneâ€? of the forum so it does not collapse into just another internet-version of a talk radio diatribe, or is that sort of communicative entropy inevitable in open-ended community discussion forums?

Oh, I should mention that one thing I’ve concluded from all of this is it would be problematic to use EMUtalk.org as one of the “case studies” for my research.  So y’all aren’t going to be my guinea pigs here.  But I do hope to attempt to apply what I do learn to better moderate/direct this forum.

“Senior Class Fuels Rise of EMU Softball”

From the Ann Arbor News comes this article, “Senior class fuels rise of EMU softball Eagles have come a long way since 2002.” Here’s some of the opening paragraphs:

Five years ago, Eastern Michigan’s softball program couldn’t have been further from the NCAA Tournament.

The Eagles lost 28 games in 2002 and 38 more a year later in Karen Baird’s first season as coach.

improved, making the Mid-American Conference tournament a season ago after a seven-year absence. The Eagles won that championship for the first time last weekend to secure their first NCAA Tournament berth.

The meteoric rise of the Eastern (27-20) continues at 7 p.m. Friday with an opening-round game at the University of Michigan.

“At that point (in 2003), I could never imagine this,” Baird said with a loud chuckle. “That was an extremely hard year. Once we got the type of players we wanted in the program, they started embracing Eastern Michigan softball and taking a lot of pride in it.”

Again, big congrats to the EMU softball team.  And hey–maybe Baird could do a little coaching in Welch?

EMU Athletics: Good News, Bad News

One of my colleagues was sort of complaining to me about EMUTalk.org the other day, asking why there isn’t the positive things about EMU there?  I do agree that it is far too easy for this site to turn into a combination of a “bitch fest” and a “pity party” far too often, and it does overlook that there really are a lot of good things going on here.  Of course, with the good there is the bad, too.

Take EMU athletics, for example.  There was a full page ad in The Ann Arbor News last night congratulating various sports programs on campus and announcing that EMU won 8 MAC championships during the 2006-2007 school year, which is the most that EMU has ever won.  So congratulations to men’s and women’s swimming and diving, men’s indoor and outdoor track and field, men’s cross country, women’s softball, women’s gymnastics, and men’s golf.  Y’all have done good!
But then, when I went to emueagles.com, I came across this concept movie/vision of the $20 million ++ Student-Athlete “Performance Enhancement” Center.  Given the location of the center (between the football stadium and the Convocation Center) and the way the video is put together, it might as well be called the “let’s get a football team that wins a few games” center.
The story that I have heard is that the funding for this center is coming from a private donor who specifically wants to fund a project for student athletics.  I guess if that’s the way it’s going to be, that’s the way it’s going to be, and I suspect that this will ultimately benefit the athletic programs on campus.  Still, I do wish that members of the Board of Regents, the administration, and the EMU Foundation would do a little more to try to convince this donor that an academic building with his or her name on it would do a lot more good for the EMU community.

EMU-AAUP Getting Involved in the Security Issues

EMU-AAUP president Howard Bunsis sent around an email about a variety of different union issues the other day, and one of the things it addressed were the ongoing concerns about security on campus (the other issues have to do with domestic partner health care benefits and paying for health insurance, which will start in the fall term).

Here’s the part about security:

In regards to safety, the Vice President of Business and Finance, Janice Stroh, sent an email to the campus community yesterday regarding safety on campus. There were several claims made in this email with respect to faculty that are disturbing, and the facts, as we know them, will be presented below.

If you go to: http://www.emuprofessors.org/security there is a general discussion of security issues, as created by Paul Leighton. Please check it out.

What we know is that in August of 2005, the master keys to several buildings around campus were lost. From that time until at least June 2006, very little, if anything, was done to re-key any campus dorms, offices, or buildings.

What is very troubling is that we, the faculty, were certainly not informed of the loss of the keys at that time. In the last year, actions were taken to secure the outside entrances to buildings, and in the last few months, most of the dorms have been re-keyed.

However, faculty offices have still not been re-keyed. When faculty in the College of Arts and Sciences asked Dean Hoft to have offices re-keyed, they were told that it was not going to happen, as it was an “unfunded mandate.� We are investigating what was communicated by EMU administrators over this time, and we are also investigating what funds were spent.

What is most disturbing is the following statement in VP Stroh’s email: “While a small number of them appear to be the result of someone using a key to enter an office, most of the larcenies have occurred because the person left a door unlocked or left their computer sitting unattended on campus.�

As you know, we have solicited from the faculty instances of equipment being stolen.
Here is what we have found:

• Over the last two-plus years, there have been 27 instances where faculty have had items stolen from their offices
• Of these 27 incidents, 19 were of computers (mostly laptops, though a few were desktops, with cables cut).
• Of the 19 computers stolen, 15 were from LOCKED faculty offices. The faculty involved has been unequivocal on this issue. Therefore, 15 out of 19, or 79% of the computers stolen from faculty offices occurred while these offices were locked. This solid evidence is in total contrast to the conclusions made by VP Stroh.
• Also troubling is that 16 of the 27 incidents occurred in the 2006-07 academic year. Of these 16, 13 were computers stolen from faculty offices. Of these 13, 11 were from LOCKED faculty offices.

Lastly, several faculty members who have had items stolen have let me know that they believe VP Stroh’s email had a “blame the victim� undertone. I agree with this conclusion, and I believe that the administration should try to be more supportive and work with faculty on this issue.

So what actions is the AAUP going to take? We are about to file a grievance on this issue, as we do not believe the administration has taken the appropriate steps to ensure a safe working environment. In addition, we are considering other legal options that the AAUP can take to make sure faculty feel safe.

Actually, I think the grievance is long over-due, though I do realize that the EMU-AAUP has had, er, “other things” on its plate over the last year or so.

“Why a grievance,” non-faculty-type readers here might ask? Two basic reasons, in my opinion. First, one of the basic things I think an employer ought to be able to provide to its workers is a safe workplace, and that would include the idea that you should feel reasonably sure that if you leave something in your locked office, it will be there when you return.
Second, the way faculty get complaints addressed at EMU, especially if the issues have been more or less ignored by the administration, is you file a grievance.
As an aside here: for a variety of reasons (including security), I moved most of my stuff to my home last winter. So, like many academic-types, my office at school isn’t really where I do most of my work– scholarship, teaching, etc. It’s where I meet with students and colleagues and store a variety of books and documents, and that’s about it. Still, I do have things in there that could be attractive for thieves– computers, for example. And of course, a lot of faculty do much of their scholarship and teaching in their offices.

Ypsilanti Courier Article on Taylor’s Pretrial

Taylor’s pretrial held to June
By Dan DuChene, Staff Writer

PUBLISHED: May 17, 2007

 

The pretrial for the suspect accused of raping and murdering an Eastern Michigan University student, in December, was adjourned until June 13. Originally scheduled for May 9, in downtown Ann

Arbor, the pretrial was adjourned to allow time for Orange Amir Taylor III’s defense to collect and dispute evidence. 

 

http://www.ypsilanticourier.com/stories/051707/loc_20070517003.shtml