Monthly Archives: June 2008

‘The Last Professors’

Here’s another one from Inside Higher Ed that I missed until just now:  “The Last Professors,” an email Q&A with Frank Donoghue, the author of The Last Professors: The Corporate University and the Fate of the Humanities. I’ll save some of the punchier comments for interested readers, but here’s one example:

Q: What are the main reasons for the erosion of the tenure-track career?

A: I believe that tenure and the kind of career it makes possible are disappearing largely for financial reasons. Opponents of tenure are less likely to make political arguments against it — except in very inflammatory cases like Ward Churchill’s — but instead are now inclined to argue that professors’ labor costs too much. The casualization of labor is the global norm, practiced by employers everywhere. Academia is one of the last workplaces to come almost completely under this management philosophy, where payment by the job replaces the traditional salary, benefits and, in the case of professors, job security. Medicine and the law are currently engaged in less acute versions of this transition from one management system to another. Among the professions, only the clergy and the officer ranks of the military seem to be immune to the erosion of tenure or its equivalent.

I dunno. I think the system of tenure that exists at elite institutions is probably gone, but I think some sort of tenure or “tenure-like” system is not going away entirely in my lifetime, and probably not at unionized shops like EMU.  But there’s a lot of commentary on Donoghue’s provocative points here.

I would guess this would please the folks in Mark-Jefferson

Though science is kind of foreign to me, I am guessing that this is good news for the likes of EMU: “Boost Proposed for Science Education,” from Inside Higher Ed. The opening paragraphs:

A House of Representatives subcommittee Thursday unanimously approved spending increases for agencies including the National Science Foundation and the Commerce Department’s National Institute of Standards and Technology, increasing their share over last year’s amount and shifting some of their focus from research to education-related programs.

The House Appropriations Subcommittee on Commerce, Justice, Science and Related Agencies signed off on the $56.8 billion bill, which would fund the agencies under the panel’s jurisdiction for the 2009 fiscal year. The markup amount is about $5 billion over last year’s enacted funding level and more than $3.1 billion above President Bush’s budget request for the year.

Farewell, AAIO

I don’t know if this EMU news exactly, but I thought I’d just give a tip o’ the hat/salute to Julie “Ann Arbor is Overrated” Lippman.  As has been reported recently in the Ann Arbor Business Review, The AANews, and on blog local Homeless Dave’s Teeter Talk, Lippman is moving on, apparently to a “quasi-academic, quasi-government” job in Maryland, I presume somepalce near DC, but I don’t really know.

Best of luck to Julie.  If she didn’t think that much of Ann Arbor, she always could have headed over to Ypsi.  And tune into her next blog, This blog is overrated, which will apparently be about a whole host of overrated-ness.

Even more about no laptops in law classes

Mark Higbee sent me this link from the Chronicle of Higher Education, “Law Professors Rule Laptops Out of Order in Class.” Check it out soon because I think this link is temporary and will probably expire in a week or two, maybe less.
Continue reading

“The Impending Death of Face-to-Face Instruction”

Wow, it’s been pretty quiet around here, I suspect mainly because EMU has managed to stay out of the news lately (I guess it’s the “off-season” with spring/summer terms), but also because I’ve been positively swamped in my own teaching right now. Speaking of which: see this article, “The Impending Death of Face-to-Face Instruction,” which is in Education Week and by EMU’s very own William J. Price (he’s a professor in Educational Leadership). Here’s a passage that I think gives a general feel for the piece:

To be fair, there are those instructors who insist that they can do everything online that they previously could do face to face, and perhaps better. Whether this is true or not is debatable, but it is not the issue that gives rise to my concerns. Rather, what I fear is that, with the lessening role of face-to-face instruction, we may diminish our ability to help students forge a social consciousness through personal engagement that will guide them in establishing meaningful relationships within an increasingly diverse workplace and larger society.

I’ll throw this out there to see what people have to say, but I will make two observations for now:

  • I’ve taught online for a couple years, I’ve taught in hybrid formats (well, once), and I have been using a whole bunch of different technologies in my teaching for about 15 or so years now, and I will tell you that I disagree wtih pretty much everything Professor Price is saying here.
  • I came across this in my “Eastern Michigan University” feed via this blog post by Rob Darrow. I do agree with him, more or less.

“University nixes web access during class”

I heard about this via a mailing list I’m on: from eSchool News, “University nixes web access during class; Officials see internet as a distraction for students.” Here’s a quote from the opening paragraphs:

University of Chicago Law School officials have a simple message for their students: less web surfing, more listening.

The school announced April 11 that the distractions afforded by wireless internet access no longer will be available during class time, although laptops still will be permitted for note taking.

The move comes as educators at schools and universities nationwide have struggled with how to keep students on task at a time when most have personal technology devices they bring to class. Although many professors have taken steps to block internet access during their instruction, the University of Chicago Law School is believed to be among the first to implement a school-wide ban.

Now, I have a feeling I am in the minority of faculty when I say this, but I think this is a pretty silly idea.

I don’t know if most professors are aware of this, but I have a news flash for you: students had PLENTY of ways to get “off task” during boring lectures long before the Internet came along. And, also something I’m not sure if most professor are aware of, there are other things one can do with a laptop besides surfing the Internet that might not be “on task.” Perhaps the problem is not the laptops or the internet access; perhaps the problem is the mode of delivery in the class. But since most “sage on the stage” kinds of professors can’t imagine another way of teaching, off with the internet. Jeesh.

I wonder how long it is going to take before the U of Chicago insists on getting rid of the laptops and going back to inkwells and quills?

EMU pays $350K fine for Clery Act violations

From the AANews: “Eastern Michigan University to pay $350,000 in federal fines over Laura Dickinson case.” Here are the first few paragraphs:

Eastern Michigan University will have to pay $350,000 in fines for violating a federal campus crime reporting law – the largest ever imposed by the U.S. Department of Education for Clery Act violations.

EMU announced today that it agreed to pay the fine, which is slightly less than the original amount – $357,500 – proposed by the department after it concluded that university officials had not properly notified the campus community that it was investigating the death of a student as a murder.

“We’re pleased to have arrived at an agreement with the DOE and we appreciate their recognition of the progress and improvements that EMU has made during the past year in regards to Clery Act compliance,” said Don Loppnow, provost and executive vice president, in a statement released this morning. “EMU will continue its efforts to emphasize safety and security on campus.”

This settlement apparently sets a record for highest fine as a result of a Clery Act violation. Not the kind of “we’re number 1″ that EMU is seeking, obviously. If there is a “silver lining” to all of this it is that as a result of these fines and violations, which obviously included but were not limited to the horribly wrong way EMU handled the Dickinson murder, it is that things will certainly be getting better. As the AAN phrased it, “The department (meaning the US Department of Education) said in the settlement agreement that EMU ‘now has procedures in place and a published policy that should substantially improve EMU’s ability to make timely warning determinations and issue campus-wide advisories, as needed.’”

EMU students get a feeling for the way engineering designs can help people

From the AANews comes this story, “Therapy walker to the real world EMU students get a feeling for the way engineering designs can help people.” I actually looked at the paper yesterday, but I don’t think I saw this piece. Guess I missed it.

Anyway, this is one of those “feel good” stories that works for me on at least three different levels. First, it’s cool that our students are doing some great and real projects to help people in the community. Second, it was news to me that there were ways to re-engineer a walker. And third, hats off to these students’ professor, Harvey Lyons, who (the article reports) came to EMU 10 years ago after many years in industry and who earned tenure at the young age of 71. Lyons is 76 now and still teaching and inspiring students (presumably because he wants to), all the more evidence to me that being a professor is very much an excellent gig.

A somewhat belated shout-out on the latest issue of emYou!

The local/student upstart publishing project emYou! The Magazine is coming right along; if you visit their web site now, you can see much of the current May/June 2008 issue which is subtitled the “Downtown Ypsi Edition.” Check it out.

Oh, and a PS to Bilaal: I will post a link to emYou! when I get around to revising/revisiting the whole EMUTalk.org site, which I am hoping/thinking I will be able to get to once my spring teaching calms down a bit. Like in July or August. Maybe/hopefully….

Closing Laura Dickinson’s room: a little behind the story

Someone who should know (but who is not a student and is not a reporter for the Eastern Echo or any other publication as far as I know) sent me an email this morning that offers a bit of a “story behind the story” about EMU’s decision to keep Laura Dickinson’s former dorm room closed up at least for a while. I posted an entry about the AAN article here.

The story really broke in the Eastern Echo. I was out of town at the time (and the Echo doesn’t show up in my EMU news feed, oddly enough), but here it is: “Housing showcase in Dickinson’s room.” The AANews article says that the room was closed after a “student leader” realized that the room being used was the one where Dickinson was murdered; that “student leader” was actually the Eastern Echo reporters.

This someone who should know also said that student housing folks were quite “brusk” with the reporter/student leader who made the Dickinson connection, and that even though Brian Fitzgerald took “full responsibility” for all this, he recently ended up with a promotion.

Anyway, at a minimum, I think the professional journalists at the Ann Arbor News owe the student journalists at the Eastern Echo an apology. As I understand it, when you are “scooped” on a story, as the AAN was in this case, it is customary to acknowledge that. And it probably would have been good for AAN to point out that the “student leaders” in question were actually the student reporters.