Monthly Archives: August 2009

Faculty/Administration tensions heating up at a bad time

EMU-AAUP President Susan Moeller sent around an email yesterday about the faculty union filing an unfair labor practice claim with the Michigan Employment Relations Commission based on “a CAS department head for twice bullying and threatening to deny an untenured faculty member tenure because of her union activities.” She also notes that the EMU-AAUP has filed more grievances with the administration this past spring/summer “during that period,” which isn’t entirely clear to me.

In any event, I don’t know the details of this specific complaint or the increase in grievances; it could mean just about anything. But with contract negotiations looming, this is kind of unfortunate. I was out the other night with someone who has some “suit connections” (shall we say) who said that at a recent administrative retreat, there was a sentiment that the tensions between faculty and administrators needs to be taken down a notch. This is true, but for that to succeed, someone has to “blink,” and neither side seems really interested in doing that right now.

If the administration really wanted to minimize the role of the faculty union at EMU, then the best thing they could do is bend a bit, give faculty a break, advocate for more money and/or a better deal, etc., etc. But if the administration really wants to rally faculty around the union and make the tensions between faculty and administrators worse, then the stuff they and the BOR have been doing lately seems right on task.

“EMU partners with Mott CC”

I saw this via my EMU news feed: “EMU partners with Mott CC: Up To 94 Credits May Be Transfered From Mott CC.” Here’s a quote:

Some Mott Community College students will be able to apply more than three years worth of credits to a four-year degree at Eastern Michigan University.

The credit transfer agreement takes effect Tuesday.

It lets students earn up to 94 credits at Flint-based Mott and apply them toward a bachelor’s degree in nursing or technology management at Ypsilanti-based Eastern Michigan.

I have kind of mixed feelings about this. In general, I think this is a good deal for students; after all, community colleges are quite a bit more inexpensive than even EMU, and maybe it makes more sense for a place like EMU to be focused more on junior/senior-level classes, not to mention graduate programs. Still, there sure seems like a lot of pressure in my department to raise enrollments in gen ed classes.

“Wandering emus (the bird) corralled” (and hypothesizing about emus and Ypsi chickens)

It’s kind of a long story as to why, but I stumbled across “Wandering emus finally corraled,” in the Leader-Telegram, the local paper in the fine “Eau Claire, WI and the Chippewa Valley Since 1881.” It’s another story about loose but soon recaptured emus that again make me wonder why we are not the EMU emus. For example: “Lake Hallie Police Chief Cal Smokowicz said… ‘One citizen reported that the emus were walking on her deck, ‘pecking’ at her patio window. Another caller reported that the emus were chasing children.’” Any bird that can scare/chase children seems pretty worthy of being a mascot to me.

Anyway, according to the story, the Wisconsin emus appear to have gotten away from someone in the area who was raising them. And, according to the story, “There is no ordinance in the village against raising the birds.” Well, this got me to thinking: given the talk in Ypsilanti regarding an ordinance that would allow people to keep chickens (see, for example, this Mark Maynard post on the subject), I wonder about the viability/possibility of raising emus within city limits? I mean, wouldn’t that be kind of like raising big chickens? And since there doesn’t appear to be any ordinance in Ypsilanti that specifically says you can’t raise emus, well, doesn’t that mean it would be okay?

Office Hours, TBA and by appointment

I’ve been busy with various school preparation things (and it’s kind of slow news around campus), so haven’t had much of a chance to post much lately here. But as I think about my schedule for Fall 2009 and about the not-so-distant faculty contract talks, I thought I’d bring up something I’d like to see addressed: the need for changing the rules for office hours.

I came across this discussion here in the Confessions of a Community College Dean blog (via Inside Higher Ed), where “Dean Dad” was talking about this post by Dr. Crazy at Reassigned Time (you gotta love the pseudonyms in the blogosphere, right?). The short version is this: the tradition of faculty holding “office hours,” because of contemporary communication technologies, is outmoded and unnecessary.

Here at EMU, faculty are contractually obligated to hold a total of 10 office hours a week, though the way that I’ve always done this (and I’ve always been told this is perfectly acceptable via the contract) is to schedule at least five hours and be available via appointment. The idea, obviously, is to be available to students, both ones in classes the faculty person is teaching and also ones a faculty member might advise. When this format was devised (30 years ago? 40 years ago? more?), requiring faculty to be in some physical place where they could help students out of class made sense. After all, how else were you to get a hold of your professor? At best, you could call the office, but even then, the professor would have to be there to answer the call.

Nowadays, we have email, texting, facebook, twitter, cell phones (I don’t give out my cell phone number to students generally, though I would if EMU was willing to supplement my bill– but that’s another story/post), etc. Every faculty person I know communicates with students outside of class via email, and often at rather odd times of the day. It is not at all uncommon for me to answer student email late at night, early in the morning, and on weekends or holidays; it’s also not at all uncommon for students to expect their professors to do this (“I emailed him last night at 2 am and my professor still hasn’t responded five hours later; he must be lazy”). Unless I require them to come and see me in person, my students almost never just “drop by” to see me.

With online courses, where the entire enterprise is held out of place and out of time, the idea of physical office hours seems even more ludicrous. And yet, faculty teaching online at EMU are supposed to hold on-campus office hours. I was reminded of this again this summer: even though I was teaching online, I was expected to hold office hours on campus. It wasn’t that big of a deal because I always have something to do on campus anyway, but to require it was, well, goofy.

Having said that, I’m not for the idea of eliminating on-campus office hours and/or availability of faculty entirely. Besides the fact that there obviously times in which meeting face-to-face is convenient or necessary, completely doing away with faculty office hours might make it difficult to conduct the other business of the university. After all, if I was teaching entirely online and there was no contractual expectation for me to ever be on campus, then why couldn’t I teach from Europe and just skip all those pesky department and committee meetings?

In any event, I realize this is a comparatively minor issue and it is not exactly a brutal hardship that professors are expected to, well, show up to work once in a while. But in a contract year where we’re not likely to get much, it might be worth revisiting the current out of date rules for office hours. Perhaps, for example, we can acknowledge that being available “via email” is pretty much the same as being available “by appointment.” And perhaps we can acknowledge that if a person is teaching completely online, there isn’t much of a need for physical office hours at all.

“Crime on campus a harsh teacher”

An interesting article in Freep.com: “Crime on campus a harsh teacher” is about crime and safety around Michigan universities. Two quotes that struck me and that certainly ties into EMU issues:

The thump-thump on the dorm room doors breaks the predawn stillness.

“Do you know why I woke you up this way?” Eastern Michigan University Officer Norm Harrington barks at bleary-eyed students stumbling to their doors.

Harrington’s not really angry. But he also has been around enough to know that college-age students make easy crime victims.

And on this morning, one month into the 2008-09 school year, he has already found eight unlocked doors in less than a half hour.

That’s one way to get dormies to lock their doors.

Then there’s this:

At Northern Michigan University, a construction worker last year inadvertently walked off with a master key. The incident fast-tracked more than $500,000 in expenses to replace keys with electronic locks and old video surveillance recorders with digital cameras, said housing director Carl Holm.

The electronic doors come with an added benefit, he said: Prop them open and an alarm is sent to campus police.

Just the other day, there was a notice from the EMU Police about a worker at EMU losing “a set of keys that access some interior doors in 10 of our buildings and an external key to one building.” Sounds familiar, doesn’t it? What I really wish EMU would do though is take the plunge they took at Northern and install electronic locks. Sure, it’d cost a bunch of money up front, but the long-term payoff with safety and security would make it worth it.

“AATA to Focus on Ypsi Cost Cuts”

From the Ann Arbor Chronicle: “AATA to Focus on Ypsi Cost Cuts.”

Looming on a six-week horizon for Ypsilanti is the renewal of its Purchase of Service Agreement with the AATA – at a price slated for 10% higher each year over the next three years to make the agreement match actual costs. That’s the context in which three out of seven Ypsilanti city councilmembers appeared at the AATA board meeting on Wednesday.

Their collective message: Recognize the fiscal constraints on Ypsilanti, focus on the 30 years of a positive AATA-Ypsilanti partnership, and find ways to cut costs of the service without cutting service levels. Their message resonated with AATA board members, who seemed more inclined to find creative ways to cut costs than to use federal stimulus dollars to simply make up the gap. Part of that creative approach could include closing the Ypsilanti Transit Station.

I don’t ride the bus much, but I know plenty of EMU folks who do. So hopefully, the AATA and Ypsi will be able to work this out.

The BOR denying tenure saga continues

EMU-AAUP President Susan Moeller sent around an update about the strange case of the Board of Regents denying two faculty members tenure in June earlier today:

I would like to update you on the status of the tenure denial cases. The EMU-AAUP Executive Committee has decided, in consultation with our attorneys, to take one of the faculty tenure denial cases to arbitration.

The EMU administration has denied our Step III grievance. This denial indicates that the administration believes that the Board of Regents has the “unfettered” right to deny any faculty member tenure for any reason at any time. We obviously believe this is not the case and this is the issue we are bringing to binding arbitration.

We are not taking both cases to arbitration on the advice of our attorneys.

Obviously, this status update raises a lot of questions that we can’t answer and probably can’t even contemplate here because if concerns regarding privacy, process, etc. But beyond that, what exactly is the Board of Regents rights regarding approving faculty for tenure and promotion? And what is tenure, anyway?
Continue reading

EMU Football to play MSU in Rynearson Stadium– maybe

From annarbor.com comes Eastern Michigan University to host Michigan State in football and basketball. Here are the opening paragraphs:

Rynearson Stadium has never hosted a Big Ten opponent.

Thanks to an agreement between Michigan State and the state’s three Mid-American Conference schools, that will soon change.

Well, maybe not that soon. But in time.

Eastern Michigan will host the Spartans during either the 2018 or 2020 season as part of The “Celebrate The State” football series that was announced Thursday in East Lansing.

Michigan State made its last trip to Ypsilanti in 1899 when Eastern Michigan was known as Michigan State Normal College.

When a football game is being planned nine to eleven years in the future, I think that has to be accompanied by the word “maybe.” Besides the fact that that is a long way off, I have a feeling that EMU will host a home game against MSU at Ford Field in Detroit.

Much more likely and realistic is that MSU will play basketball at EMU in the 2011-12 season.

EMU and No Worker Left Behind

I just found out about this via the EMU History Department Facebook page (of all places!): EMU and the No Worker Left Behind program. To quote from the site, “No Worker Left Behind (NWLB) is a plan for accelerating the transition of workers into well-paid jobs by providing up to two years worth of tuition (not to exceed $5,000 per year) at any community college, university, or other approved training provider to gain the skills and credentials for new careers in high-demand occupations, emerging industries, or to start a business.”

“Pushing back on requests for salary cuts”

I came across this this morning, and it seems like something worth posting here as the 2010 faculty contract negotiation process gears up: from Inside Higher Ed, “Pushing Back on Requests for Salary Cuts.”

It’s a short piece:

In this budget year, many faculties (unionized or not) have been asked by administrations to accept salary cuts or freezes or other modifications of their work arrangements. The Collective Bargaining Congress of the American Association of University Professors issued a statement Tuesday urging faculty groups to resist such calls — unless they receive more power in shaping the direction of their institutions.

“The AAUP thereby resolves that faculty should work to turn this situation around, and should not give their pay away in temporary measures that do not structurally readjust higher education’s direction,” says the statement. “Turning the situation around means that faculty should (a) gain access to full information about institutional finances and all other strategically relevant data, ensuring that institutions open their books to shed light on the institution’s overall condition; (b) exercise a fuller voice in analyzing and making recommendations about budgets and strategic directions, opening the boardroom door to take a central role in institutional decision making; & (c) pursue measures that reverse the long standing trends and protect the core academic functions of higher education, opening up educational opportunity by reinvesting in educational expenditures.”