From annabor.com, “Eastern Michigan University’s part-time lecturers campaign for union.” From the opening paragraphs:
A campaign is underway at Eastern Michigan University to unionize 450 part-time lecturers, who are asking for better pay and benefits.
The administration will negotiate a contract in a timely manner if the employees vote to unionize, but students could end up paying for any increased costs through their tuition bills, school officials warned.
I guess we’ll see how this works, out, but I have two thoughts on this, at least initially:
- I have a very VERY difficult time believing that the administration will simply shrug their collective shoulders and say “sure, that’s okay.” Rather, I just assume that the administration will do everything it can to resist this, and if it does happen, I predict that the suits will offer only a very bare-bones contract that is practically not a contract at all.
- I personally have mixed feelings about all this. On the one hand, I’m all for unionization and we have in my department some great part-timers. In fact, we have a number of folks who are “part-time” in name only: that is, they are teaching a full-time load but they are being paid considerably less (especially if you factor in insurance and other benefits) than full-time lecturers. I think that’s wrong, and if the part-timer union is able to stop this practice, it will be worth it.
On the other hand, one of the reasons why every college and university in this country has some sort of category of part-timer is to deal with the ebb and flow of enrollment, of faculty and lecturer lines, and so forth. In that sense, EMU is like any other business that hires both full-time and part-time employees: grocery stores don’t hire everyone full-time because a) they can’t afford to, and b) they don’t need to. My concern would be that a part-time union might cause some problems that would ultimately hurt both faculty and lecturers, not to mention students who probably would indeed end up paying at least part of the bill.
