Category Archives: Board of Regents

“Who really runs Michigan universities?”

A loyal EMUTalk.org reader sent me a link to this Michigan Public Radio commentary by Jack Lessenberry, “Who really runs Michigan universities?” and it seemed like a good idea to share it here.  Lessenberry is concentrating on Michigan’s “big” universities– UM, MSU, Wayne–  and how the boards work and run things.  Here’s a quote:

University boards set tuition rates, approve or reject budgets, and generally wield a lot of power. But who selects them?  You may not realize it, but when it comes to Michigan’s three major universities, you do. Or, at least, can.

Michigan, unlike most states, has two different kinds of public universities. Most of our 15 state schools have their boards appointed by the governor. But the U of M, Michigan State and Wayne State have theirs chosen by a statewide vote of the people, just like the governor himself. And the candidates for these boards are nominated by our major political parties and placed on the ballot.

He goes on to point out that more people ought to pay more attention than they typically do about who is getting elected to these boards, though Lessenberry generally thinks these elections “work” and board members do a good job.

Of course, what I really would have liked to have seen Lessenberry talk about is how the other 12 public universities in Michigan– including EMU, of course– have boards where members are not elected but rather appointed by the governor.  How well does Lessenberry think these boards “work?”

Budget problems worsen (and I like what BOR member Morris said)

It’s been mighty mighty busy around here with my day job as of late, so I was happy to see a loyal reader send me a couple of links about ongoing budget problems at EMU, notably this annarbor.com piece, “EMU’s budget shortfall expands to $4.6 million.”   Here are the opening paragraphs:

EMU Chief Financial Officer John Lumm told the EMU Board of Regents on Tuesday that the shortfall, which was reported at $1.7 million at last month’s regents’ meeting, had ballooned to $4.6 million by Sept. 15.

When he first reported the shortfall at a Sept. 20 regents meeting, Lumm originally said the gap could grow to $5 or $6 million by the end of the fiscal year, which isn’t until June 30, 2012.

The university is developing a plan to cut back costs and accommodate for the potential deficit, Lumm told the regents Tuesday .

I’ve got two ideas for cutting costs right off the bat:  first, travel back in time and raise tuition enough to cover the expenses you knew you were going to incur.  As I said before and I’ll say again:  EMU probably would have laid off people over the summer no matter what, but had we raised tuition by 5% or 6%, we would likely not be in this situation now.

Here’s another idea:  maybe it’s time to fire Lumm.

One of the things that comes up in this article is some of the problem with EMU’s finances has to be laid at Lumm’s doorstep.  And Board of Regents member Mike Morris pointed this out.  Here’s a quote:

EMU has $87.4 million in investments. About 37 percent of that amount —or $32 million— is cash or short-term investments. Another 17 pecent constitutes moderate-term investments and the remaining 46 percent is long-term investments.

Morris contended that the university should more heavily invest some of the money it has in cash and short-term investment, which have low return rates. He highlighted the University of Michigan and Michigan State University invest more aggressively and see greater returns.

“I don’t know why we have so much money in cash and short term investments,” Morris said.

Why indeed.

Not surprisingly, 3.65% was not enough to cover expenses

At least that’s what I would have had for the headline for this annarbor.com story, “EMU’s budget shortfall could grow to $6M, regents told.”  Here’s a quote:

Eastern Michigan University enrollment levels declined this year, ending the school’s two-year growth streak and contributing to a growing budget shortfall.

EMU is experiencing a $1.7 million shortfall so far this fiscal year, EMU Chief Operating Officer John Lumm reported at a Board of Regents meeting Tuesday afternoon.

The gap, Lumm said, could grow to between $5 and $6 million by the end of the fiscal year.

The reasons include the enrollment decrease and a drop in investment income.
“The challenges we face are really twofold: The enrollment shortfall is one, the second one, which is way too early to draw any conclusion on, is the investment income,” Lumm said. “Investment income is tracking down year to year. The markets are down.”

The markets are down?  That’d make sense if EMU were an investment bank, but since EMU is a university which derives most of its resources and income from tuition, I somehow think that the artificially lowball “let’s throw some people under the bus” tuition increase might have something to do with it.

One more thing from this article:

“Obviously this is a pretty discouraging report,”[Board of Regents Chairman Roy] Wilbanks said. “If this track continues, the board is going to have to give some type of budget amendment.”

Lumm goes on to suggest that this “budge amendment” might mean more cuts, but as I said back in June, I have a feeling this 3.65% tuition increase is temporary.  Look for a bigger hike in Winter term, folks.

A couple of passing pictures from today’s Pray-Harrold Dedication

When I came into school this morning, there was a Pray-Harrold dedication ceremony going on in the student commons/Eagle Cafe area. So I thought I’d share a couple of iPhone pictures and thoughts.

I was too late to get a seat for the festivities even if I wanted one; it was packed:

Pray-Harrold Speakers in the Student Commons

I’m not sure who is speaking here, but sitting behind that person are members of the Board of Regents and (on the far right) the dean of the College of Arts and Sciences Tom Venner.  I’m sure great things were said, blah-blah-blah.

Anyway, I was hanging around outside the commons area where there was a table with the photos and these very odd “keepsakes” for today’s event:


That’s a paper fortune teller game of the sort I recall vaguely as a child.  You know, you fold this thing up, you put it on your fingers, you pick a number, flick your fingers that many times, and then pull up the fold to find your fortune.  For example, under here, you have the fortune “you will be a millionaire” and “the main stage is your future.”

Oh, and the whole thing came in a little “TRUEMU” box.  I can’t imagine who signed off on this or why, but I have to say this is about the goofiest marketing promotional thing I’ve ever seen.  Doing no promo work at all probably would have been more effective.

Anyway, as I was walking away with my paper fortune teller memento, I snapped this picture of construction that was going on not 30 feet away from the dedication:

But the construction continues

Of course there are things that will be works in progress/under construction in Pray-Harrold for a while; I think everyone understands that.  But I have to say it is a little strange for there to be a BoR “let’s congratulate ourselves and everyone else for a job well done” sort of ceremony while a construction guy is reattaching a bulletin board in the hallway.

When will an “annoying inconvenience” move into “keymageddon”?

I hesitate posting this because, as I commented earlier, I think the adjectives of “ashamed” and “outrage” are a little over the top at this point about the key snafus.  There’s a need for everyone to go into tomorrow’s grand opening of Pray-Harrold for classes with a little bit of optimism and lots of patience.  On the plus-side, I think there are many features in the building that will make it a much more comfortable space for learning and working, and while there will obviously be construction folks doing various construction things for the rest of the semester and adjusting temperatures and everything else, it is pretty impressive how much they’ve been able to accomplish in less than a week.  No one would confuse Pray-Harrold with a “brand new” building, but it’s a heck of a lot nicer than it was, and if you had never been in Pray-Harrold before, you’d wonder why people complained so much about it.

So thumbs up to all that, and patience-patience-patience, happy-thoughts, happy-thoughts, happy-thoughts.

However, I think that the powers that suits at all levels better be aware that there’s a fine line between faculty, staff, and students tolerating a few problems and… well, not.

I wasn’t at the College of Arts and Sciences meeting today in part because I was wrestling with the schizophrenic copier/scanner (that’s nothing new, btw), but I heard President Martin was there and among other things joked about the lack of keys.  Ha.  Ha-ha.

I did run into a guy from the physical plant today in Pray-Harrold who was there to deal with keys.  He seemed like a nice and earnest guy and all, but I did not get a sense from him that he had any idea of the extent of the problem.  There are around 150 people in my department (once you count up all the graduate assistants, part-timers, lecturers, faculty, and staff), and as far as I can tell, there are two keys to open up all those offices.  And don’t get me started talking about getting into locked classrooms and computer labs.

Anyway, everyone knows there are going to be problems and hopefully people are bracing for it as best they can.  I think if the key issues are mostly resolved by early next week, this will all be forgotten.  But what I worry about is that the key shop and the physical plant are so overwhelmed that they simply cannot complete this work without subcontracting some of it on an emergency basis, and that’s money I am certain the administration is going to do all it can to avoid spending.  And if the key problems linger on into September, well, I have a feeling these are problems that will be remembered and adjectives like “outrage” will be more appropriate and nouns like “grievance.”    And key snafus have a way of causing all kinds of problems.

A little bit of weekend reading to share

A few days ago, a loyal EMUTalk reader sent me a link to “The Debt Crisis at American Colleges” from The Atlantic.  This person described it as “a tad scathing, but interesting,” and I think that’s a pretty accurate description.  On the one hand, this isn’t us because EMU is just not that expensive (and it wasn’t that expensive before, which means it should have raised tuition more than 3.65% in order to cover its expenses, but I digress) and we certainly don’t have some of the luxuries described here.  On the other hand, I do fear the possibility of a bursting student loan bubble, and I think there are too many students at EMU (and everywhere else) taking out student loans they can’t afford and with no clue as to how they are going to pay them back.

The other piece I thought folks might be interested here was in the Sunday New York Times, “College Football’s Ugly Season, Facing Scandals of Every Stripe.” The opening sentence is “College football is set to start its new season Sept. 1, but a kind of dispirited consensus has taken hold about a sport that has been played on American campuses since 1869: its reputation has never been more damaged.”  And then it goes from there, cataloging the various problems in big-time college football over the last couple years.  EMU isn’t mentioned, but you can see how we fit into the mess.

Oh, one more late entry to this:  via the blog mental floss comes “11 Unusual Majors Your College Probably Didn’t Offer.”  Their number one odd major is “Bowling Industry Management,” but I also think it’s kind of cool that Southern Illinois has a blacksmithing major.

At least EMU isn’t Rutgers

That’s not a phrase I’d generally use since Rutgers is a great university, but this article published by the Bloomberg news service, “Rutgers Boosting Athletics at Expense of Academics Fails to Emulate Texas,” actually makes me glad that our current Board of Regents isn’t gutting academics as badly here.  Believe it or not.  The opening paragraphs:

Rutgers University forgave $100,000 of the football coach’s interest-free home loan last year. The women’s basketball coach got monthly golf and car allowances. Both collected bonuses without winning a championship.

Meanwhile, the history department took away professors’ desk phones to save money and shrank its doctoral program by 25 percent. After funding cuts by the deficit-strapped Legislature, New Jersey’s state university froze professors’ salaries, cut the use of photocopies for exams and jacked up student tuition, housing and other fees.

Rutgers also increased funding for sports. The 245-year-old school spent more money on athletics than any other public institution in the six biggest football conferences during the 2009-2010 fiscal year, based on data compiled by Bloomberg. More than 40 percent of sports revenue came from student fees and the university’s general fund.

“I am dumbfounded,” said New Jersey Assemblyman David Wolfe, a Republican who is a professor of psychology at Ocean County College in Toms River. “Rutgers officials appear before the Legislature every year and claim they are underfunded and need more money. Now we find out we have the No. 1-subsidized athletics program in the country.”

That last passage there suggests Rutgers’ sports spending might come back to bite them in terms of state funding.  I wonder if the Michigan legislature will notice any of the funding for athletics at the expense of academics at EMU….

Oh, the bit about Texas mentioned in the headline is discussed later in the article.  Texas is one of seven universities (according to this piece, at least) that make enough money from football to pay the bills for athletics and beyond.  Note that:  seven out of what I would guess to be 200 (or so?) BCS universities.

CMU faculty on verge of strike (or a preview of fall 2012 at EMU)

While sitting through some rain at my undisclosed northern retreat this morning, I came across news that “CMU faculty contract bargaining at standstill as classes start Aug. 22″ (via mLive) and “Start of school year at Central Michigan University in jeopardy as contract talks drag” (via the Detroit Freep). It’s a pretty predictable situation in that the union is asking more than what the administration wants to give, though it sure doesn’t seem like the faculty is asking for much.

What is perhaps a little more interesting is that there are no talks scheduled and it would seem that the administration is allowing the faculty to work without a contract right now– or I guess under the terms of the old contract– and the administration is apparently not willing to come back to the table.  I guess my question is “what’s the catch?”  The CMU administration has a deal on the table that is clearly worse than the conditions that the faculty are working under right now, the faculty are willing to continue working under the old contract, and (presumably) the administration is not going to lock faculty out.  Why would the faculty settle for a worse deal, especially if they can keep working on the old one?

Of course, that’s all based on a pretty cursory reading of the situation.  I’m sure there’s more to it.  But I will say this:  both the administration and the EMU-AAUP ought to keep a close eye on this one because it is what our August 2012 is almost certainly going to look like.

Vacay midterm: faculty vs. administrators

Minnnesota sunset
I’m writing from an unusually warm family vacation in Minnesota– that’s a picture of a beach area that I liked. Since I’m inside and being air-conditioned for a while, I thought I’d write a brief post on the sort of contrast of opinions I’ve heard very recently about what’s wrong with universities nowadays.

Shortly after arriving for this reunion of sorts, my father, who is fairly conservative and definitely not an academic, wanted to show me this editorial in the Des Moines Register, “Gartner says Iowa’s state universities need to change quickly.”. Basically, former regent member Michael Gartner is all over the place with the problems of the universities in Iowa, blaming it mostly on lazy and shared-governance seeking faculty, the places not being run enough like businesses, and (and I swear I’m not making this up) binge drinking by the students.

At almost the same time, an alert EMUTalk reader sent me a link to this CHE piece, “The Strategic Plan: Neither Strategy Nor Plan, but a Waste of Time,” which is from a book called The Fall of the Faculty: The Rise of the All-Administrative University and Why It Matters by Benjamin Ginsberg. The headline is almost all you need to know about the Ginsberg piece, especially for those amongst us who have had to deal with some kind of program review paperwork mumbo-jumbo.

Anyway, the conservative point of view is that the problem is the faculty, and the liberal point of view is that the problem is the administration. I tend to agree with Ginseberg, though Gartner is not completely wrong, either. The troubling thing for me is that the Gartner view seems to have a lot more play with non-academic types like my family.

Facebook folks: cast your vote in the Echo FB poll

I noticed that the Eastern Echo has rolled out a poll on Facebook about the tuition hike.  Here’s a link to it; I think this should work to click on and then to vote, but I’m not positive.  Anyway, the question and answers are:

How do you feel about EMU’s 3.65 tuition increase?

  • It’s great!  The university kept students in mind when tackling the budget.
  • The university shouldn’t have raised tuition at all.
  • EMU should have raised it more to help balance the budget and save jobs.
  • I don’t care either way because I still have to pay tuition.