It would appear that the administration’s/Board of Regent’s layoffs have settled out– that is, we seem to know the scope and reach of them. A few thoughts I thought I’d share:
- I’m surprised by the number of AP layoffs. As far as I can tell, nine AP folks were fired, some who had been here as long as 24 years. I’m not going to speculate too much on the thinking behind all the choices, though I heard from one soon to be former employee that the firing suit seemed to have a certain level of glee dropping the axe.
- There have been some dean/associate dean-level positions eliminated too, including the dean and associate dean in Extended Program and Educational Outreach (aka Continuing Education). I’m not really sure what that means; is that program going away and/or what? That would include lots of online and alternative programs, right?
- Susan Moeller sent around an email with a link to this all union press release. I’d include text from it here, they put it out in a PDF that can’t be easily copied for some reason. The tally there is 30: 12 clericals, 14 PTs, and 4 physical plant folks. I of course understand why the these folks are mad (heck, we’re all mad), though this press release seems a little all over the place and out of control to me. Don’t write angry, folks.
- In her email, Moeller also wrote:
In addition President Martin was not around as the lay offs were occurring. She went out of town after announcing the layoffs at the Board of Regents Tuesday meeting. A real leader would have stayed and personally handled the layoffs to explain the decision to keeps millions in athletics and lay off 40 employees. She should be willing to explain to her employees why she did this.
As EMU presidents come and go, Sam Kirkpatrick is remembered for the University House mess, John Fallon is remembered for lying about a student’s murder, and Sue Martin will be remembered for needlessly laying off employees and making Athletic’s First at EMU not Education.
Time will tell how Martin’s legacy is impacted by this, of course. I blame the Board of Regents more than her and this is not the first time employees have been laid off at EMU, but I see Moeller’s point.
- Just for the sake of argument, let’s say that the top suits (Martin, Lumm, etc.) and the Board of Regents did not have bad intentions. Let’s assume they held tuition to a completely inadequate 3.65% increase not because they wanted to create a crisis to justify firing some people and/or to play hardball with the unions, but they really were keeping tuition as low as possible to benefit students. Never mind that they knew they were benefiting students and the football team by firing people; I want to believe the suits and BoR aren’t doing this because they’re evil. I really need to believe that these people aren’t evil.
- But I do think these folks have made terribly wrong decisions, and I think the last couple of years focusing on keeping costs low low low (the press release emphasizes “fiscal stewardship,” the lowest increase for any state university three years running, etc.) demonstrate they are both not thinking of other universities around us and they are fundamentally misunderstanding the reasons why people go to a particular college. Keeping things super cheap benefits students for the short-term at best. Students don’t pick universities based on the
cheapnessthriftiness if its administrators; they pick universities based on programs of study, reputation, location, family and friends, social factors, and then costs, especially when costs are in the same basic range.
