And now the other side of the student loan debt crisis currently in the news– or maybe not a crisis: ”What does $1 Trillion in Student Debt Really Mean? Maybe Not That Much,” from CHE. Unfortunately, it’s behind the paywall. Here’s a long quote though:
A trillion is a big, round number. It has some shock value. But what does crossing the $1-trillion mark really tell us?
For one thing, that more people are going to college—and graduate school. The sum is an estimate of all outstanding education debt: private and federal student loans for undergraduates, parents, and graduate and professional-school students. And greater educational attainment is a goal the Obama administration and many nonprofit groups are pushing.
At the same time, in the wake of severe state budget cuts, tuition is rising, and students and their families are footing a larger share of the bill. A greater percentage of bachelor’s-degree recipients have borrowed, and the average amount of debt per borrower has also risen. About two-thirds of graduates of public and private nonprofit colleges have loans, with the borrowers’ average debt about $25,000, according to the most recent analysis, of the Class of 2010, by the Project on Student Debt. (The average debt for the Class of 2004 was under $19,000, according to the federal government, which counts somewhat differently.)
Total outstanding student-loan debt—even $1-trillion of it—may not have broad economic implications. It’s still too small a sum to derail the economy, at least for now, says Mark Kantrowitz.
And so forth, the article goes on about how college debt is good debt, how someone borrowing a reasonable amount for a reasonable degree is good, etc. I mostly agree with this, but it of course doesn’t completely dismiss all the problems of college debt and for me even brings attention to different problems. For example, is it such a good idea that more people are attending college and graduate school and going into huge amounts of debt to pay those bills? I dunno about that.
