Category Archives: Budgets

“What does $1 Trillion in Student Debt Really Mean? Maybe Not That Much”

And now the other side of the student loan debt crisis currently in the news– or maybe not a crisis:  ”What does $1 Trillion in Student Debt Really Mean?  Maybe Not That Much,” from CHE.  Unfortunately, it’s behind the paywall.  Here’s a long quote though:

A trillion is a big, round number. It has some shock value. But what does crossing the $1-trillion mark really tell us?

For one thing, that more people are going to college—and graduate school. The sum is an estimate of all outstanding education debt: private and federal student loans for undergraduates, parents, and graduate and professional-school students. And greater educational attainment is a goal the Obama administration and many nonprofit groups are pushing.

At the same time, in the wake of severe state budget cuts, tuition is rising, and students and their families are footing a larger share of the bill. A greater percentage of bachelor’s-degree recipients have borrowed, and the average amount of debt per borrower has also risen. About two-thirds of graduates of public and private nonprofit colleges have loans, with the borrowers’ average debt about $25,000, according to the most recent analysis, of the Class of 2010, by the Project on Student Debt. (The average debt for the Class of 2004 was under $19,000, according to the federal government, which counts somewhat differently.)

Total outstanding student-loan debt—even $1-trillion of it—may not have broad economic implications. It’s still too small a sum to derail the economy, at least for now, says Mark Kantrowitz.

And so forth, the article goes on about how college debt is good debt, how someone borrowing a reasonable amount for a reasonable degree is good, etc.  I mostly agree with this, but it of course doesn’t completely dismiss all the problems of college debt and for me even brings attention to different problems. For example, is it such a good idea that more people are attending college and graduate school and going into huge amounts of debt to pay those bills?  I dunno about that.

“Crushed by college debt: Massive loan bills hang over graduates, derail life plans”

From the Freep comes “Crushed by college debt:  Massive loan bills hang over graduates, derail life plans.”  It popped up in my EMU feed because it referenced a student here who has lots of debt:

However the political battles are resolved, it won’t change the future for millions of graduates, such as MoReno Taylor II, 29, of Lansing, who sees his $80,000 in loans for Eastern Michigan University coloring his life.

“It impacts you in every way. Job decisions, searching for a potential home,” he said. “Knowing that you have that debt hanging over your head is debilitating.”

I have to say the comments for this piece raise some interesting questions for me.  Perhaps I should know more about why students are borrowing so much money in the first place, so maybe I just don’t know what I’m talking about here.  Besides that, I will freely admit that I grew up privileged enough that most of my college was paid for by my parents, and I also went to college in an era when tuition was a lot less.

Having said that, it seems to me there are some pretty simple ways to avoid that much debt.  For starters, if I was in a situation now where I had to pay for college out of my own pocket, I would certainly attend community college for a couple of years and get the gen ed stuff taken care of at half the price.  I certainly wouldn’t borrow to pay all the bills– that is, borrowing money to not live with the parents and to go to school full-time.  I’d probably live at home, work, attend part-time, etc.

And then there’s this quote at the end of the piece that makes me think:

Jessica Scott, 26, of Grand Haven graduated in 2009 from Central Michigan University with a degree in journalism and $60,000 in debt.

She’s working four part-time jobs, can’t afford health insurance and is living at home because she can’t make her debt payments and pay rent, too.

“It seems silly to think that myself, at 18 years old, made this kind of staggering financial decision,” she said. “I had no idea what I was getting into, or what it could possible lead to. When I graduated high school in 2004, taking out loans to pay for school is just what you did. There was an unspoken promise that you’ll graduate, find a great job and move on with your life. But as we know, that isn’t what happened.

“Now I’m left with a mountain of debt, a great deal of stress and the hopelessness that I’ll never get out from under this. This one financial decision, which took no time at all to make and a quick flip of a pen, will now define my future.”

It reminds me a little of the old days of students and credit cards.  This doesn’t seem to be as visible on campus as it once was and banks have tightened the rules on credit cards, but just a few years ago, there were tons of stories of young college kids who charged things willy-nilly and then got themselves forever in debt.  I’m not saying this is the same thing because it’s not, but at the same time, I wonder if part of the problem is it’s too easy to borrow too much money.

 

 

Congrats, graduates: the bad news

“Dean Dad” at Confessions of  Community College Dean (now at Inside Higher Ed) had a sobering post yesterday about college graduates, “Class Dismissed.”  Here are the opening paragraphs:

Half of new bachelor’s degree grads are either unemployed or underemployed, according to the Associated Press.

The market isn’t ready to absorb them. Specifically,

According to government projections released last month, only three of the 30 occupations with the largest projected number of job openings by 2020 will require a bachelor’s degree or higher to fill the position — teachers, college professors and accountants. Most job openings are in professions such as retail sales, fast food and truck driving, jobs which aren’t easily replaced by computers.

I had to smile at “college professors” making the list. When I entered graduate school during the first Bush administration, we were told that a great wave of faculty retirements was on the horizon, and that we’d be in high demand be the time we got out. We all know how that played out. It’s entirely possible that college professor positions will open in great numbers, but only if you fail to differentiate between adjunct and full-time positions. And having adjunct positions available hardly gets around the “underemployment” issue.

And if you don’t think college professors can’t be replaced by outsourced workers, well….

Speaking of bad news, CBS Sunday Morning had a surprisingly good story about the high cost of a college education, “Some hard lessons about college costs.”  Click the link to see a link to the video; here’s a pretty good quote though:

“In other industries, we found ways to produce things using fewer labor hours, using more technology,” said Sandy Baum, a senior economics fellow at George Washington University (which, at $55,000 a year, is pretty pricey). “We haven’t really figured out how to do that in education.”

The result? College tuition has risen as twice the pace of inflation. In fact, they’ve doubled in 10 years.

Baum also said the increased cost is not due to faculty being paid lots of money: “Faculty salaries have been pretty stagnant. But their compensation goes up when health care costs go up.”

Add to that the increasing number of administrators (for both good and bad reasons), athletics, and college spending on “lifestyle” amenities like posh dorms and workout facilities and you start to see why college costs more than it should.

I guess this means I have to stop complaining about Dominos

The Michigan AAUP sent around an email this afternoon with this interesting tidbit:

The Michigan Legislature is in the process of finalizing the 2012-13 budget. The House version of this bill contains language that would prevent universities that receive public funds from collaborating with any nonprofit organization that publicly criticizes any Michigan business.
Specifically: ”It is the intent of the legislature that a public university that receives funds in section 236 shall not collaborate in any manner with a nonprofit worker center whose documented activities include coercion through protest, demonstration, or organization against a Michigan business.”
The proposed language is so broad that it could potentially prevent public universities from forming partnerships or placing students with virtually any civic, religious, or other nonprofit organization that engages in public outreach. This is clearly interference in the curriculum that is offered at our universities and therefor an infringement on the academic freedom of the students, faculty and universities.
Take Action - tell your legislature to reject Sec 273a of the 2012-13 House version of the higher education budget bill.
It’s always hard to tell how these things will actually play out/get rewritten before they actually become law, and then even harder how these kinds of laws get enforced.  Still, this seems like an unnecessary and potentially dangerous provision to the budget.

 

I wish MSM would report the whole story about student loans

Obama was out and about yesterday talking about the problem of student loan debt and the need for colleges/universities to keep costs down.  There were numerous reports on all this; this piece from NPR, “Negotiating The College Funding Labyrinth,” is pretty typical.

I don’t disagree with a lot of what’s here.  College does cost too much, students are borrowing too much, and there is a lack of transparency regarding the cost of higher education, particularly at private institutions where it is common for students to negotiate what they pay based on how much they can afford.  This is all a problem.

However, there are two things that are always always always left out of these stories.  First, the reason why college costs so much– or at least the reasons why public institutions cost so much– is because the government (mostly at the state-level) has stopped funding higher education.  Imagine the difference it would make if the feds kicked in a few billion dollars into public higher ed in this country:  for a tenth of what we’re spending on the military, I think we could have a system in the US where attending college was virtually free.

Second, student loan debt is too high in part because too many students borrow more money than they need because the loans are easily available and young people don’t necessarily think long and hard about the implications of paying back loans.  And I say this based on experience:  in my MFA program, I took out student loans, much of which I used to pay legitimate expenses of course, but much of which I used to do things like buy speakers for my stereo.  Of course, I still have those speakers, so maybe it was a worthwhile investment.

 

Faculty salaries driving up the cost of college? Not so much

Here’s an interesting piece from today’s Inside Higher Ed, “Slow Recovery.”  To quote the opening paragraphs:

An annual survey of faculty salaries being released today by the American Association of University Professors paints a dismal picture, suggesting that a historic low period for compensation increases continues. This trend may go on for a while, the report says, and it questions whether the numbers will ever go back to where they were before the Great Recession.

According to the survey, titled “A Very Slow Recovery,” average faculty salaries rose by 1.8 percent in 2011-12 at institutions that submitted data for this academic year and the last one. The increase, the survey points out, is less than the 3 percent rate of inflation in the same time period.

“When all of the salary data submitted in each year is adjusted to account for inflation, the overall average salary of a full-time faculty member in 2011-12 is less than 1 percent higher than it was five years ago, in 2006-2007,” says the report, which includes data from 1,250 colleges and universities.

But I really think they buried the lead here.  The piece also includes a handy chart that compares the average increase in tuition and fees at colleges/universities over the last 30 years versus increases in faculty salaries.  So, for example:  while tuition and fees at public four year institutions have risen 72% over the last 10 years, faculty salaries at maters universities (e.g., places like EMU) have declined 5.3%.

Ypsi five year plan includes income tax

This is a little off-topic for EMUTalk, but since there are lots of readers here who live in Ypsilanti and that many more that make money in Ypsilanti (e.g., EMU), I thought I’d share this post from markmaynard.com, “State of the City of Ypsilanti– the Five Year Plan.”  This is the part that I thought be of most interest:

In February of this year, Ypsilanti city council passed a bold five-year budget plan. The plan calls for preserving police, fire, and support services by replacing lost property tax revenue with a city income tax and a Water Street debt millage. Both proposals will be placed on the May 8 ballot for voter approval. The proposed city income tax is 1 percent for working Ypsilanti residents and ½ percent for nonresidents who work in the city. According to the independent City Income Tax Feasibility Analysis commissioned by City Council, the city income tax would raise $1.3 million from city residents and $1.5 million from nonresidents who work at Eastern Michigan University and other businesses in the city. Virtually every city income tax dollar paid by a city resident will be matched dollar-for-dollar by non-resident workers who also rely on city police, fire, and other services. Since the general fund property tax rate is already at the state constitutional maximum of 20 mills, a city income tax is the only other significant revenue source available to the city.

For what its worth, I live in Ypsi and I support a local income tax mainly because I don’t think the town has a lot of other options.  Well, other than just dissolve and become part of the township.

Student loans seen as potential ‘next debt bomb’ for U.S. economy

An alert EMUTalk.org reader sent me this from Saturday’s Washington Post, “Student loans seen as potential ‘next debt bomb’ for U.S. economy.”  Here’s the opening paragraphs:

Bankruptcy lawyers have a frightening message for America: They’re seeing the telltale signs of a student loan debt bubble that is placing increased financial pressure on families struggling with their children’s mounting debt. According to a recent survey by the National Association of Consumer Bankruptcy Attorneys, more than 80 percent of bankruptcy lawyers have seen a substantial increase in the number of clients seeking relief from student loans in recent years.

In most cases, those clients could not meet the federal hardship standards that are necessary to discharge a student loan through bankruptcy proceedings. Instead, many of these parents or guardians who co-signed the student loans face the prospect of losing their life savings, cars or homes to collection agencies for aggressive private lenders.

And then there’s this alarming paragraph:

The amount of student borrowing skyrocketed from $100 billion in 2010 to $867 billion last year — or more than the $704 billion in outstanding U.S. credit card debt, according to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Of the 37 million borrowers who have outstanding student loan balances as of third-quarter 2011, 14.4 percent have at least one past-due student loan account. Together, these balances come to $85 billion, or roughly 10 percent of the total outstanding student loan balance.

Yikes.

“Top 10 EMU officials collect combined $2.4 million”

From annarbor.com, “Top 10 Eastern Michigan University officials collect combined $2.4 million in 2011.”  You know, I have to say that I’m not really bothered too much by this list.  I think the coaches get paid too much money, but unless EMU wants to get out of the big-time sports business (not a bad idea, never gonna happen) we’re going to pay enormous salaries for those people.

It’s a worthwhile read, but here’s the top 10 list:

  • Football coach Ronald English: $367,920
  • President Susan Martin: $295,120
  • Former Provost Jack Kay: $274,083
  • General Counsel Gloria Hage: $227,293
  • Vice President of Development Thomas Russell: $220,645
  • Assistant football coach Phil Snow: $214,481
  • Former basketball coach Edward Ramsey: $202,828
  • Chief Financial Officer John Lumm: $197,277
  • Athletic Director Derrick Gragg: $196,466
  • Social work faculty Donald Loppnow:$194,738

By the way, the next 10 highest paid EMU employees?  All faculty, and all but one of them a College of Business prof.

More budget follies in the email from President Martin

I’ve been kind of busy with the day-job and/or life lately, so this is kind of old news by now.  But President Martin sent around an email the other day with the subject line “Campus Update:  Governor’s Budget/Organizational Changes.”  The second part is more about some shifting around of who reports to who; the first part basically reiterates what EMU-AAUP President Susan Moeller’s email said, which is there continue to be some budget problems.

It’s all kind of murky to me.  We were cut a ton last year and we might get back a little next year as a one-time deal, but that’s about it.  However, EMU is also $3 million in the hole right now, and Martin says it will be no big deal to come up with that money.  So it seems like we don’t have any money but we can come up with some easily enough when we want to or have to.  This will be interesting to watch as EMU-AAUP contract negotiations heat up this summer.

Oh, and there is apparently a bill before the State legislature which would allow community colleges to grant 4-year degrees.  Martin says that it’s passed the house and is “alive until the end of session in December 2012.”  I don’t know what that means in terms of likelihood of passing, but I do know that if students at Washtenaw CC or Henry Ford CC could finish 4 year degrees there, EMU might have a bit of a problem.

The whole thing after the jump.

Continue reading