Category Archives: Faculty Life

“What do professors do, anyway?”

I guess this is in the theme of professors being paid too much for doing too little:  from HuffPo a few days ago comes “What Do Professors Do, Anyway?” by Susan Herbst, who is the President to the University of Connecticut.  It’s a response by a widely condemned op-ed piece by David Levy in the Washington Post where he claims faculty 9-15 hours a week for 30 weeks a year.  Here’s a long quote from Herbst that I think sums it up pretty well:

So perhaps the best question isn’t, “Do college professors work hard enough?” Instead, it might be, “What do professors do, anyway?”

For professors, actual time spent teaching in the classroom is the tip of the iceberg that follows a great deal of preparation: sifting through mountains of books and articles to pick the texts for students to read; creating detailed course plans; producing voluminous notes and presentations for every class and writing a syllabus, among other things. Professors don’t just stroll into class and say what’s on their mind.

Professors can have 20, 30, 40 to 300 students in a class or lecture and they often require individual attention for myriad reasons: help understanding the course material, to discuss their approach to a paper or why they received a particular grade, among many others. This isn’t confined to the set office hours most faculty hold. The advent of e-mail changed the way many students and faculty interact, so many professors are always on duty in this respect.

Advising students and grading their work takes significant time, as does campus life — oh, the committees. Many professors devote a good deal of their time to various other assignments: search committees to hire colleagues or administrators, tenure review committees, curriculum committees, PhD. committees; and a host of task forces and working groups formed to address all the challenges your average college and university can encounter. This takes countless hours, but must be done and is often beneficial for the institution. They must also engage in professional development on a regular basis, to ensure they are at the forefront of their discipline.

By the way, speaking of university presidents supporting faculty:  a shout-out to EMU President Susan Martin for coming to the retirement party/honoring of four of my colleagues in the English department:  Shelia Most, Jeff Duncan, Russ Larson (who used to be the department head too) and Bob Holkeboer (who has done a ton of different things at EMU, including running the graduate college and starting the honors program).  Martin was the only administrator to make it to the event, and I know all of our retirees appreciated her being there.  And we’re losing about 160 years worth of EMU experience from my department this year too, which is kinda sad.

 

Faculty salaries driving up the cost of college? Not so much

Here’s an interesting piece from today’s Inside Higher Ed, “Slow Recovery.”  To quote the opening paragraphs:

An annual survey of faculty salaries being released today by the American Association of University Professors paints a dismal picture, suggesting that a historic low period for compensation increases continues. This trend may go on for a while, the report says, and it questions whether the numbers will ever go back to where they were before the Great Recession.

According to the survey, titled “A Very Slow Recovery,” average faculty salaries rose by 1.8 percent in 2011-12 at institutions that submitted data for this academic year and the last one. The increase, the survey points out, is less than the 3 percent rate of inflation in the same time period.

“When all of the salary data submitted in each year is adjusted to account for inflation, the overall average salary of a full-time faculty member in 2011-12 is less than 1 percent higher than it was five years ago, in 2006-2007,” says the report, which includes data from 1,250 colleges and universities.

But I really think they buried the lead here.  The piece also includes a handy chart that compares the average increase in tuition and fees at colleges/universities over the last 30 years versus increases in faculty salaries.  So, for example:  while tuition and fees at public four year institutions have risen 72% over the last 10 years, faculty salaries at maters universities (e.g., places like EMU) have declined 5.3%.

“The Laptop (or professor) Problem”

A loyal reader sent me this article, which I’ve seen in a couple of different places, “The Laptop Problem” (from The Washington Monthly). This isn’t a new issue:  the basic desire to institutionally ban laptops from classrooms ignores at least three issues for me.  First, sometimes it’s really useful for students to have laptops with internets connections.  Second, there’s a really easy solution to this that’s missing and this article suggests:  if a professor thinks that students ought to turn off their laptops, why not say “hey, close your laptops and pay attention to this.”  How hard is that?

And third, if a professor is so boring that it is prompting students to check their Facebook status and/or update their Twitter feeds, then maybe they ought to be more interesting?

“Tablet Ownership Triples Among College Students”

Perhaps I find this most interesting because I anxiously await the arrival of an iPad 3 iPadHD the new iPad on Friday, but I thought this piece on the Chronicle web site was worth sharing:  “Tablet Ownership Triples Among College Students.”  And, at least according to this survey, more students also now prefer digital textbooks to print ones, which is a complete reversal of a similar survey from about a year ago.

“Graduate student unionization bill heads to Snyder”

From annarbor.com comes ”Graduate student unionization bill heads to Snyder.”   It’s an AP wire story about how bill designed to block unionization of graduate assistants at U of M has made its way to Governor Snyder’s desk, and he’s likely to sign it.

Two things that occur to me about this.  First, this is the climate in which the faculty are about to start negotiating a new contract.  I have no idea how that process is going to go, but it seems pretty clear to me that striking faculty will not be looked on kindly by the legislature or the governor.  And second, why in the heck does annarbor.com need a wire service to do a story that is this local?

Rochester Prof’s defense of Rush

Via Inside Higher Ed comes “Debating Prof’s Defense of Limbaugh;” here are the opening paragraphs:

Rush Limbaugh has faced widespread criticism in the last week — even from some who agree with his hard right politics — for calling a Georgetown University law student a slut and a prostitute for her advocacy of employee health plans covering contraception.

Limbaugh has since apologized, but one of his rare defenders — a University of Rochester economics professor — is facing criticism on his campus (and a protest in his class on Wednesday) for his blog posts that said Limbaugh was absolutely correct in his criticism of the law student.

“[W]hile Ms. Fluke [the law student] herself deserves the same basic respect we owe to any human being, her position — which is what’s at issue here — deserves none whatseover [sic]. It deserves only to be ridiculed, mocked and jeered. To treat it with respect would be a travesty. I expect there are respectable arguments for subsidizing contraception (though I am skeptical that there are arguments sufficiently respectable to win me over), but Ms. Fluke made no such argument. All she said, in effect, was that she and others want contraception and they don’t want to pay for it,” wrote Steven Landsburg, the professor, on his blog, The Big Questions.

I don’t know all the details here of course, but I did spend a few minutes reading the article and looking over Landsburg’s blog.  I think he’s kind of missing the point of what Limbaugh did.  Rush isn’t in trouble for offering a thoughtful albeit provocative argument against insurance subsidized birth control; he’s in trouble because he spent several days on his show calling this woman a slut, suggesting that all college students on birth control on should share sex videos, etc.  That crossed the line.

Anyway, I don’t know enough about the case to know if Landsburg too has crossed some lines here, but I do know one thing:  here’s yet another example of how professors are far from universally liberal.

Update:  In response to Carl’s comment, here is a ThinkProgress video that documents the 70 times Rush directly and indirectly accused Fluke (and “coeds” in general) of having “so much sex,” calling them slutty, etc., etc.

“College Completion,” a CHE special report

The Chronicle of Higher Education has an interesting series of articles and infographics called “College Completion.”  Given some of the conversation we’ve had here and around EMU in general about graduation rates, this is definitely worth the browsing.

There are some problems with the claims being made here and EMU doesn’t even exist in the CHE’s info graphic, but still, some interesting observations.  I’ll note two for now.  In the article “Students Who Don’t Count,” Sara Lipka reports, claims: “Of the five million students who started college in the fall of 2009, 2.4 million of them didn’t fit the federal definition” of what the U.S. Department of Education counts as a college student in terms of graduation rates.  ”Transfers, part-timers, and students who take a break and re-enroll either later or elsewhere—even if they graduate—don’t count.”  She highlights a number of these “non-traditional” students who fall through the cracks at the end, and a lot of those students look a heck of a lot like EMU students.

Oh, and because Obama was a transfer student, he wouldn’t have counted as a college graduate according to the way feds count graduation rates.

The other thing that I thought was pretty interesting was the opening paragraphs of the article “To Raise Completion Rates, States Dig Deeper for Data.”  Let me quote at length:

The Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system allows students to apply for enrollment until the Friday before classes began. But then administrators at one college looked at what happened to those students and discovered a pattern: Students who enrolled closer to the start of the semester didn’t do as well as those who had signed up earlier.

As a result of that finding, the college required new students to apply at least 10 days before the start of the semester, and similar efforts are being studied at other institutions in the statewide system.

The change in policy is meant to save the students and the institutions from wasting time and money on courses that are more likely to lead to failure, says Leslie K. Mercer, associate vice chancellor for policy and planning at the statewide system, which collects extensive information on the roughly 280,000 students enrolled in credit-bearing courses.

While a relatively minor decision, that sort of change can make a big difference in helping colleges to ensure student success. And it’s an example of the kinds of policies that are possible only when states and systems track and analyze the academic performance of individual students.

I see this first hand at EMU almost every semester.  In my classes, there is almost always a direct relation between student success and when students enroll:  the earlier the enrollment, the more likely they will do well in class.  And students who register at the last moment and/or after a class begins are the most likely to drop or fail my classes.

To me, this is an example of the kind of minor change EMU could make if the administration was really interested in graduation rates instead of enrollment/tuition money.  I am willing to bet a doughnut that if we had a policy similar to this one in Minnesota, we’d see an uptick in graduation rates.  But we’d also see a downtick in numbers, both in terms of enrollment and money.  After all, those students who register for classes and then fail still pay tuition.

Anyway, interesting stuff.

 

EMUTalk “investigates” up-north hijinks

A loyal EMUTalk.org reader sent me this email:

FYI — an Eastern Michigan University student participating in EMU’s Winter Break program at Shanty Creek Resorts in Gaylord, MI was arrested this week, released from jail, and sent back downstate, possibly expelled.

There were other issues, as well. The local police were called back to the Resort to investigate a complaint filed against an EMU staff member and EMU students weren’t being carded at the Resort Bar.

As a parent and tax payer, I find this very upsetting and troubling.

Please investigate.

Generally, we don’t have the resources at the EMUTalk.org media-plex to do investigative work of events that happened in the (near) past and a couple hundred miles away.  But it’s easy enough for me to ask:  anybody know anything about all this?

Quasi-breaking

The EMUTalk.org blogging complex is still open for business this week during winter break, mainly because EMU’s break is badly timed to not correspond to my son’s break, which thus makes the idea of doing something actually break-like (for example, going on a trip) impossible.  Which raises the question:  wouldn’t it be nice if EMU (and U of M for that matter) and all the local area schools could all agree on a particular week?

In any event, my “break” will involve some catching up on my day-job, a few writing projects, maybe some stuff around the house, and (probably) some maintenance/changes to this site.  So if you stop by in your time off and see some changes, don’t be alarmed.

Check out the Adjunct Project

The problems of non-tenure-track teaching in higher education in the U.S. (and there are many:  both problems and non-tenure-track teachers) has been circulated and discussed in many different formats over the years, but here’s a new one to me:  The Adjunct Project, which is now a full-blown web site/blog, began as a shared Google spreadsheet where adjunct instructors from all over the country started posted some of the details about their jobs for points of comparison.  It’s a little tricky to sort through the spreadsheet, but once you get the hang of it, you can see the similarities and differences of part-time work at universities all over the place.

I don’t think this is going to do much to solve the problem, but anything that makes the issue visible is probably a good thing.

Oh, and there is an article in The Chronicle about all this, “A Simple Spreadsheet Strikes a Nerve Among Adjuncts.”