Category Archives: Security and Safety

“Message to Faculty from Chief Heighes and Provost Schatzel” (which is more or less a response to Moeller’s earlier email on faculty safety)

Faculty and a ton of other people received an email from Provost Kim Schatzel and DPS Chief Robert Heighes yesterday with the subject line “Message to Faculty from Chief Heighes and Provost Schatzel.” It’s about issues of safety on campus generally but specifically it’s a response to the emails about student harassment issues EMU-AAUP President Susan Moeller have sent out recently, including one last week. I include Moeller’s earlier email and this message from Heighes and Schatzel after the break.

I’m sure folks have thoughts they want to share here; I’ll kick things off with a couple of brief observations:

First,there’s an interesting disconnect in the scope of the problem. While Heighes/Schatzel say “each and every incident of concern is important to us,” they want to emphasize that this is a relatively small problem:

For all of 2014, our DPS records indicate there were 13 incidents in which a faculty member or lecturer filed a report with the Department of Public Safety regarding a classroom conduct concern. This is out of 257,938 classroom hours delivered on our campus. Of the 13 incidents that were reported, none resulted in criminal charges.

On the other hand, Moeller’s email said:

Our faculty survey results show that at least 100 faculty have had students threaten them in or outside of their classrooms.  This is a systemic problem at EMU, which culminates in a culture where students feel free to harass and bully faculty with no worry of any recourse. The recent situation in the honors college (where three female faculty members, in a course with over 200 students, dealt with harassment through social media) is a perfect example of just that. The Provost did nothing about that situation and the faculty members received more support from the press than the administration of this university.  It’s time to change that culture.

Part of the disconnect is the EMU-AAUP is basing its argument on feedback from faculty in a survey about a variety of issues that are on the table in these recent contract negotiations. In this case, it seems to me that both the administration and the EMU-AAUP are probably right: that is, it seems entirely possible that at least 100 faculty would report to being harassed in some sense by students over their time at EMU (though maybe the harassment that faculty have felt over the years didn’t necessarily mean they would have contacted DPS), and at the same time, only 13 of those incidents became a problem that involved DPS in fall 2014.

Second, there’s an interesting disconnect in the process. Moeller’s email lays a lot of the blame with the Office of Student Conduct, while the Heighes/Schatzel email says that the contact for these kind of faculty safety issues is DPS. Moeller says the response time from the administration has been too long, while Heighes/Schatzel says that it hasn’t been. Interestingly enough, both the EMU-AAUP and the administration cite a “Classroom Management Flow Chart (PDF)” that indicates the process for dealing with these problems. Which I guess means both the EMU-AAUP and administration are agreeing on the process but they’re disagreeing on how the process works.

And third, there are clearly still some issues on the table. Heighes/Schatzel don’t address the issue that Moeller has raised about how the administration and DPS have not permanently removed students from classes where it’s so bad that a security guard has to be set up outside the classroom or where there is some kind of court order. It also seems to me that there’s no reason why faculty shouldn’t have the contractual right to have a student removed from a class for disruptive and harassing behavior.

Anyway, the whole emails below for those who are interested and/or who haven’t read them yet.

Continue reading

“Pizza delivery man robbed at gunpoint at Peninsular Place”

From mLive comes “Pizza delivery man robbed at gunpoint at Peninsular Place.” I thought I’d share this story of crime at everyone’s “favorite” apartment complex for two reasons. First, the good news is that the police arrested the two guys suspected in the robbery, which, when you think about it for a second, shouldn’t be that hard to do. I mean, the pizza guy who was robbed presumably has the address of the robbers, right?

Second, the pizza guy in question, who identifies himself as “Nate,” posted in the comment section about the robbery. At least I assume that’s the guy.

In other BoR meeting news

But I will say this: not everything the Board of Regents did yesterday was a politically motivated hack job not at all in the interests of the university.

First off, EMU will go smokeless beginning July 1. There’s an interesting “FAQ” here; just to quote from a couple of things:

Q. Can I smoke or use tobacco in my personal vehicle when it’s parked on campus, or when I’m driving on campus?

A. Smoking/use of tobacco is not permitted in your personal vehicle, whether parked or in motion, if the vehicle is located on university-owned, operated, or leased property as defined by the policy.

Q. Does EMU have the right to tell me I can’t use tobacco products on campus property?

A. The University has a responsibility to establish policies that positively affect the health and well being of the campus community. It’s understood that the use of tobacco is a personal choice and is legal for adults to purchase and consume. The tobacco-free policy does not prohibit tobacco use; it simply establishes where use can and cannot occur.

Q. How will the policy be enforced?

A. The guiding principle of enforcement will be respect for all. This crucial approach needs to include tobacco users and non-users, and must encompass respect for the policy the University has adopted. We hope this principle will help guide everyone as the University transitions to a healthier, tobacco-free environment.

From review of other campuses, best practice suggests that these changes in culture can happen with everyone working to be respectful of the policy. Repeated violation of the policy will be addressed through the Student Conduct and Community Standards Office for students and Human Resources for employees. Compliance can be achieved through consistent messaging, policy education and the provision of cessation programs.

One question that occurs to me now is can students smoke in the dorms? I think that smoking in the dorms might already be against the rules, but I don’t know.

Second, campus cops are going to start wearing body cameras, which I suspect is going to become the norm everywhere within a few years.

Ypsi cops to wear body cameras; Chris Rock interview raises a couple of interesting points to share here

This is kind of a tangent post (as I really try to keep this site pretty squarely about EMU most of the time), but given some of the conversation/campus events lately, I thought I’d go ahead and point these things out.

First, it turns out that “Ypsilanti police will be wearing body cameras by March.” This story is from mLive, but I’ve heard about it on NPR too. I believe Ypsi is the first place in Michigan where this is happening. No one should kid themselves into thinking that this is going to “solve” the problem of police shootings like what happened in Ferguson, but a) if Darren Wilson had been wearing a body camera, I think we would have had at least some additional evidence about what happened when Michael Brown was killed, and b) when cops have had to wear body cameras (notably in California), incidents of police brutality/shootings went down like 80% (though I don’t have that citation on that one right in front of me or anything).

Second, there’s a great interview of Chris Rock making the rounds now that is totally worth reading even if you are only sorta/kinda a fan. One loyal reader suggested I share it because of what he had to say about college campuses:

What do you make of the attempt to bar Bill Maher from speaking at Berkeley for his riff on Muslims?

Well, I love Bill, but I stopped playing colleges, and the reason is because they’re way too conservative.

In their political views?

Not in their political views—not like they’re voting Republican—but in their social views and their willingness not to offend anybody. Kids raised on a culture of “We’re not going to keep score in the game because we don’t want anybody to lose.” Or just ignoring race to a fault. You can’t say “the black kid over there.” No, it’s “the guy with the red shoes.” You can’t even be offensive on your way to being inoffensive.

When did you start to notice this?

About eight years ago. Probably a couple of tours ago. It was just like, This is not as much fun as it used to be. I remember talking to George Carlin before he died and him saying the exact same thing.

I think he kind of has a point, though I personally think Maher’s “riff on Muslims” was pretty ignorant.

Then there’s also a longer (too long for me to just cut and paste) and interesting take on the mess in Ferguson. Among other things, Chris Rock says if he was reporting on it, he’s interview white people because “We know how black people feel about Ferguson.” Smart stuff.

“$100K endowment goal reached by Eastern Michigan University scholarship foundation”

From mLive, “$100K endowment goal reached by Eastern Michigan University scholarship foundation.” From the article:

Eastern Michigan University has announced it reached a $100,000 endowment goal for criminal justice students thanks to the annual Greg O’Dell Golf Outing.

For the last three years, the outing has been held each September at the Eagle Crest Golf Club in Ypsilanti. Thanks to the efforts of the outing the university will continue to issue the scholarships in the coming years.

“Pleas from 3 ex-EMU football players charged with beating cousin of Demarius Reed’s killer”

From today’s mLive, “Pleas from 3 ex-EMU football players charged with beating cousin of Demarius Reed’s killer.”  From what I can gather, the deal is these football players who were suspended from the team and thrown out of school earlier in the year all took plea deals that basically make these charges lesser misdemeanors where they aren’t going to be facing any jail time.  As someone in the comments said, they’ll be back playing football (probably division II) within a year.

I have no idea bout that, but it does raise the question: if they have now been convicted of a lesser crime, can they come back to EMU if they want?

“Keeping students safe: a year after murder of Demarius Reed, do students feel safer on EMU campus?”

The Ypsilanti Courier has a nice piece about campus safety, “Keeping students safe: a year after murder of Demarius Reed, do students feel safer on EMU campus?” The basic answer to the question in the headline is “yes.” A quote:

Desmond Miller, EMU Student Government president, said much has changed since last year, including the amount both city and university police officers patrol the area as well as the hiring of additional police officers.

“We feel the police presence,” he said. “We felt it before but we really feel it now.”

Not only have the officers been more visible, Miller said they have also been having a friendly relationship with students and fitting in well with the campus community.

Miller said he’s heard positive comments from students about the safety improvements.

“Students feel a lot more comfortable,” he said.

As I’ve said before, I have never felt unsafe on campus, though there are some areas just off campus– including the neighborhood where Reed was killed– that still seem pretty dangerous to me.

“Too Many Campus Alerts?”

This was from last week’s Chronicle and it was behind the firewall (oh, I have my ways…), but I thought I’d post at least a link and a quote:  “Too Many Campus Alerts?” A quote:

Campus officials and people who sell those systems know they have a problem. “You don’t want the whole car-alarm syndrome. When you hear a car alarm, you just walk on by because you hear them all day,” says Ara Bagdasarian, chief executive officer of E2 Campus by Omnilert, an emergency-alert system used by about 850 colleges across the nation.

Scott G. Burnotes, director of emergency management at the University of Miami, says he can understand the students’ frustrations, but he’s quick to note the university’s larger concerns.

“We cannot just rely on one type of technology. We can’t just rely on text. There are technology failures,” Mr. Burnotes says. “To get people to take action, individuals need to hear something from at least three different sources. That’s why we hit them with the text. That’s why we hit them with the call. That’s why we hit them with the email.”

It strikes me as kind of a damned if you do/damned if you don’t situation. On the whole, too many alerts is better than too few, even if they are kind of annoying.

“On Campus, Grenade Launchers, M-16s, and Armored Vehicles”

From The Chronicle comes “On Campus, Grenade Launchers, M-16s, and Armored Vehicles.” Here’s a quote:

Should the campus police at the University of Central Florida ever need a modified grenade launcher, one sits waiting in the department’s armory. Retooled to fire tear-gas canisters, the weapon was used several years ago for training purposes, according to Richard Beary, the university’s chief of police. It hasn’t left storage since.

At Central Florida, which has an enrollment of nearly 60,000 and a Division I football team, the device was acquired, a police spokeswoman said, for “security and crowd control.”

Yikes. It takes so little imagination to see how campus cops might get out of hand with this equipment during a student protest or what-not. This is the same Department of Defense program that gave the cops in Ferguson, Missouri all of the military-grade hardware that fueled the riots in that town last month.

The good news, as far as I can tell from this table the CHE includes with the story, is that most of the stuff the DoD has given to college campuses is pretty mundane and there isn’t a lot of it in Michigan. MSU got a bunch of stuff that looks like it is mostly surgical/first aid gear; U of M got some computers and barriers (I presume the sort of thing you’d put up to redirect traffic), and Western got one “Mount, Sight” and 20 “Face Shields.”

“Crimes and Misdemeanors:” ET interviews AD Heather Lyke

Well, this is kind of interesting: our friends at Eagle Totem alerted me the other day to this post, “Crimes and Misdemeanors.” Jeremy Rosenberg had a chance to sit down with Athletic Director Heather Lyke to talk about the the recent somewhat late suspension from the football team (and also the university) of Darius Scott, Jay Jones, and Quincy Jones and this is what he wrote.

Read what he posted over there, but here’s a quote:

She said that, “University policy is [that] we’re not going to make a public … statement about any misdemeanor.” Lyke went on to clarify that this directive does not originate from the Athletic Department, that is comes from the University.

This is the distinction, readers. According to Lyke, the Athletic Department had a statement crafted and ready to go if the charge was changed to a felony. A distinct line is drawn between a misdemeanor and a felony, Lyke said that there are “different paths that we have to go down” depending on the nature of the charge. A felony charge triggers a series of actions that simply do not occur in the case of a misdemeanor.

You know how I said something was fishy about all this? Turns out the fishiness is coming from the Washtenaw County Prosecutor’s Office. In short, how is this crime not a felony? Not that I’m rooting for Scott, Jones, and Jones to have a felony on their record, quite the contrary, but they put this dude in the hospital with a fractured orbital bone and multiple lacerations.

In other words, according to Lyke, these guys weren’t charged with a felony and that’s why the AD and such didn’t have to come forward.

Rosenberg said that Lyke seemed sincere and wanting to be open about all this, but there are still two things that I have to say nag at me a bit. First, why is this not a felony? Rosenberg blames the Prosecutor’s Office and maybe he’s completely right about that. But according to what Lyke told Rosenberg, the AD office knew that there was a crime but they didn’t know who committed the assault until the three players got together with Coach Creighton, who then persuaded them to turn themselves in.

So here’s my question: did these guys get a sort of “preemptive plea bargain” of calling the assault a misdemeanor rather than a felony as a result of turning themselves in? And I wonder if anyone in the AD’s office got on the phone with someone in the Washtenaw Prosecutor’s Office (and after the Reed killing, there are probably people in both offices who know each other well) and said something like “Look, these guys were good friends with Demarius and they guy they beat was the cousin to the scumbag who killed him. So maybe if they turn themselves in we can look the other way on this whole felony thing?”

And second, if this is indeed just a misdemeanor– like getting caught with drugs or alcohol in your dorm room– how does EMU kick these guys completely out of school?

So it seems to me that Lyke’s answers actually raise some other questions.