Category Archives: State Government

“Michigan’s public universities see 24% increase in ‘unrestricted’ net assets”

From the freep.com comes “Michigan’s public universities see 24% increase in ‘unrestricted’ net assets.”  Maybe it’s just me, but this seems to be a pretty muddled and confusing article to me.  It seems to be saying that public universities in Michigan have a lot of extra cash on hand, but then it points out that this extra “unrestricted” money is being used for one-time expenses.  In fact, the picture leading this story is of the renovated Pray-Harrold.

So maybe it’s my simplistic sense of money, but I am not completely seeing what the point is here.

I will say two things though.  First, remodeling/renovating Pray-Harrold has been in the work for years and years, certainly over more than one budget cycle.  And I also don’t think you’re going to find anyone on campus who thinks that the work that was done was somehow frivolous, as I think the article is implying.  Second, I suspect that this argument will come back this year in contract negotiations, as well it should.

“Michigan Democrats developing college grant plan”

In “I’ll believe it when I see it” news, I heard on Michigan Radio this morning this story, “Michigan Democrats developing college grant plan.”  In the nutshell, the proposal would pay for college tuition at a public Michigan university for students who completed their K-12 schooling in Michigan, presumably at public schools.  I think this is obviously a great idea that will never happen.

“State aid to universities soon could hinge on performance goals”

I heard this one this morning on WEMU, but here’s the Freep article on it:  ”State aid to universities soon could hinge on performance goals.”  To quote:

Michigan is one of 17 states implementing or studying performance funding. The goal is to push universities to focus more on producing graduates, which in turn drives state economies with more highly skilled employees. Lawmakers also see it as a move toward greater accountability in education.

Michigan’s universities say it’s an attempt by lawmakers to wrangle control, and stress that after this year’s 15% budget cut, it’s time to increase and not potentially cut state funding.

It’s a good article with lots of details and perspectives– definitely worth a read.  Personally, I think that some kind of performance-based funding is probably not a bad idea, though there are a lot of details to work out, even about the definition of students making progress toward graduating.  We have lots of students at EMU who take a long time to graduate because they simply can’t afford to go to school full or even half-time.  And if you can only take six or nine credits a term, well, it’s going to take a while.

The other thing that I think would be interesting about this is the people of the state ought to be careful what they wish for.  If places like EMU (and WMU, CMU, WSU, etc.) had a significant amount of its funding tied to graduation rates, then it seems likely to me that these schools would raise their admission standards.  And if a lot of these schools raised their admission standards, a lot of Michiganders would not have access to a college education.

“Rick Snyder to announce sweeping DPS reforms Monday”

From the Freep comes “Rick Snyder to announce sweeping DPS reforms Monday.” Read on for the EMU connection:

The plan would restructure the failing school district, which has a $327 million budget deficit, by moving underperforming DPS schools under a new authority to be run by current DPS Emergency Financial Manager Roy Roberts, according to sources.

Roberts would have the authority to make new work rules at those schools, a process sources familiar with the discussions said could take a year. A law passed this year gives emergency managers new powers to control academic and financial matters and to cancel or modify union contracts.

A southeast Michigan university, widely believed in higher education circles to be Eastern Michigan University, would also be involved to do teacher training in the schools.

I don’t know exactly what role EMU will play in this, but it seems like it is going to be a large and significant “experiment” in Detroit Public Schools.

But there is some good news once in a while

Though it’s important to point out that the “good news” comes in the form of “things might not be that bad.”  EMU Faculty Senate President Matt Evett emailed faculty over the weekend to let us know that a) the cut to funding might not be quite as bad as we had originally thought, and b) the stuff in the bill that would take away benefits to domestic partners is unconstitutional or unenforceable, and Snyder’s legal counsel is suggesting it be taken out.  So we’ll see.

Incidentally, I was busy at an academic conference this past weekend, and I spent some time talking with a colleague from North Dakota, which is one of the few states in the country that is running a significant budget surplus.  The conservative state legislature there is also keen on making cuts to social services and to higher education, which to me is another example about how none of this is about money so much as it is about politics.

Anyway, Evett’s email after the “continued” part.

Continue reading

EFMs makes the Colbert Report

I usually don’t stay up late enough to watch The Colbert Report live, so I just saw this now.  It’s a commentary on the “Emergency Financial Managers” (or F-’em, as he pronounces it) in Michigan and Benton Harbor.  Worth watching if you haven’t seen it before.
 

The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
The Word – Autocratic for the People
www.colbertnation.com
Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor & Satire Blog Video Archive

Sorry for Snyder– wondering what that means for a recall

Man about town Mark Maynard has an interesting post at his blog, “Rene Greff on her support of Rick Snyder for Governor.” Greff (and her husband) own the Arbor Brewing Company, which includes Ypsilanti’s popular Corner Brewery, and the Corner Brewery is a place popular with EMU groups like the EMU-AAUP, other faculty groups (my department recently held a retirement party there), and local around town and mostly progressive causes.

So a lot of locals/patrons were less than amused when it emerged that the Greffs made reasonably significant contributions to Rick Snyder’s campaign for governor.  In Maynard’s post, he quotes at length a response Greff has about this criticism.  Among other things, she points out that Arbor Brewing continues to support lots of important local and grass-roots sort of events, that the Democrat running didn’t have a chance. and she more or less implies a level of regret for supporting Snyder now– that is, if I knew then what I know now, etc.

I actually have a lot of sympathy for this, especially that last one.  I recall having conversations with a number of left-leaning folks who know a lot more about Michigan politics than me who thought Snyder would be reasonable and not as partisan/right-wing as the alternatives.  In the early days of the Wisconsin mess, I thought “well, at least Snyder won’t do anything like that.” I think a lot of people thought that.

Which, by the way, is one of the reasons why I personally support a Snyder recall:  he hasn’t turned out to be the kind of Republican many folks thought they were voting for.  Not that the recall has a lot of chance, but still….

“Michigan Teachers Forced to Rely on Food Stamps”

This from a colleague and friend of the site:  from Politicususa, “Michigan Teacher Forced to Rely on Food Stamps.” Basically, it’s a story about a full-time adjuncts at Central Michigan University who is being paid so well (not) that he qualifies for government aid:

Patrick McGinnity has an MFA and he has taught English at CMU for three years as a full-time faculty member. Patrick’s $24,600 yearly salary is insufficient to support his family of four, so they rely on government assistance, including WIC and a Bridge Card, to keep food on the table.

Dr. Mike Evans and Kenlea Pebbles are married CMU faculty members with two children. Although Kenlea is full-time and Mike teaches at four other colleges in addition to CMU, they make under $40,000 a year. Their two children, like Patrick’s qualify for reduced price school lunches, MI Child health insurance, and other tax-subsidized services.

It’s a little misleading because these cases are about people who are technically not “full-time” and not on the tenure-track.  Still, it does reflect the reality that universities like CMU (and EMU, and WMU, and even places like U of M) employ many more marginally paid part-time faculty than they do tenure-track and permanent faculty.  So when state governments try to cut funding for those “fat cat” professors, the ones who get hurt first are these kinds of folks.  It’s also important to note that the Union of Teaching Faculty at CMU are in the process of negotiating a contract right now.

Great– Michigan is increasingly like Wisconsin (and the email problem)

This from Inside Higher Ed:

A think tank in Michigan has filed state open records requests seeking e-mail messages to and from labor studies scholars at three universities, related to the skirmishing over public employee unions in Wisconsin, according to the blog Talking Points Memo. In the wake of the controversial filing of a similar request for the e-mail records of a leading scholar at the University of Wisconsin at Madison, the Mackinac Center For Public Policy submitted requests under the state Freedom of Information Act to policy centers at the University of Michigan at Ann Arbor, Wayne State University, and Michigan State University. The requests seek e-mails since early January that include the words “Scott Walker” (Wisconsin’s governor), “Wisconsin,” “Madison” and “Maddow” (for the MSNBC commentator Rachel).

Isn’t that just swell?  Wisconsin’s witch hunt is spreading.  Though, as the CHE points out, this is not the first time in which email requests in higher education has been an issue. “‘Academic Freedom’ Offers Little Protection Against New Efforts to Obtain Professors’ E-Mails” (this is a link to the article behind the firewall that requires an EMU login) catalogs a host of investigations and efforts to get at university email, though most of those requests have come in the name of reporting or the freedom of information act.  Basically, while there are a lot of protections and roadblocks that get in the way of these requests for email messages, “academic freedom” is not in and of itself a reason to turn down requests.  And linked to this CHE piece are previous articles about privacy and faculty email messages from back in 2002 and 2004.

Again, I mention that my email address is emutalk at gmail dot com.  But while I would agree that this latest somewhat alarming news is another good reason for everyone to use an alternative and non-institutional email, this isn’t exactly a foolproof solution.  Google and other companies have to field these sort of legal requests too, and besides, my emutalk at gmail dot com email message can become an EMU email simply by someone forwarding it.  In other words, email is not like, well, “mail:”  that is, it isn’t a sealed envelope containing a message which is likely to only be seen by the intended audience.  Rather, email is more like a postcard that anyone could read if they pick it up; or, in extreme circumstances when an email is forwarded and re-forwarded, it’s more like a message on a billboard.

And another important issue to remember here is that these requests for professor’s email messages don’t preclude what is protected by academic freedom and other various means:  what a professor writes, thinks, and teaches.  To that extent, it’d be easy enough for professors to say “sure, I wrote some emails in praise of Rachel Maddow and against Scott Thompson and/or Rick Snyder.  So what?”

“Wisconsin Gets Weirder”

A very interesting story from Inside Higher Ed: “Wisconsin Gets Weirder.” It is really “must reading” for those amongst readers who wonder what the “big deal” is about academic freedom, the potential for political witch-hunts from this odd Republican agenda against education, and the reasons why it’s important for everyone to have an email address that isn’t tied to the institution.

To quote at length:

William Cronon, the Frederick Jackson Turner and Vilas Research Professor of History, Geography and Environmental Studies at Madison, is among the university’s most visible and highly respected scholars. Like many of his colleagues, he has been greatly disturbed by Walker’s approach to public employee unions, and he has taken advantage of his prominence to take his critique public, in high-profile ways.

Most visibly, he published an op-ed last week in The New York Times in which he sought to show that the Republican governor’s “assault on collective bargaining rights” represents a break with his state’s (and his party’s own) history, and drew a parallel between Walker and one of his forebears in Wisconsin’s Republican Party, Joseph McCarthy.

But Cronon has done other writings that are less historical. He created a new blog this month, called Scholar as Citizen, and its first post, on March 15, sought to lay out “who’s really behind” the anti-union legislation in Wisconsin and elsewhere. The blog post discusses the role that national groups like the American Legislative Exchange Council play in spreading conservative ideas and seeding conservative policies at the state and local level, and suggests — while acknowledging that direct evidence is hard to find — that the groups have helped engineer Walker’s agenda.

“One conclusion seems clear: what we’ve witnessed in Wisconsin during the opening months of 2011 did not originate in this state, even though we’ve been at the center of the political storm in terms of how it’s being implemented,” Cronon wrote. “This is a well-planned and well-coordinated national campaign, and it would be helpful to know a lot more about it.”

Unhappy Republicans

Apparently not everyone thinks so. Two days after that blog post, Cronon revealed in another blog entry late Thursday, an employee of the state Republican party, Stephan Thompson, filed an open-records request asking lawyers at Wisconsin-Madison for all e-mail messages into and out of Cronon’s university e-mail account that mentioned Walker and other Republican legislative leaders or used the terms “Republican,” “collective bargaining,” and “recall,” among others.

“The timing of Mr. Thompson’s request surely means that it is a response to my blog posting about the American Legislative Exchange Council, since I have never before been the subject of an Open Records request, and nothing in my prior professional life has ever attracted this kind of attention from the Republican Party,” wrote Cronon, who surmised that the open-records request was designed to show that he had violated Wisconsin’s prohibition on use of state resources for “partisan political purposes.” He called on the party to withdraw its request.

“Mr. Thompson obviously read my blog post as an all-out attack on the interests of his party, and his open records request seems designed to give him what he hopes will be ammunition he can use to embarrass, undermine, and ultimately silence me,” he continued. “I’d be willing to bet quite a lot of money that Mr. Thompson and the State Republican Party are hoping that I’ve been violating this policy so they can use my own emails to prove that I’m a liberal activist who is using my state email account to engage in illegal lobbying and efforts to influence elections. By releasing emails to demonstrate this, they’re hoping they can embarrass me enough to silence me as a critic.”

The perceived effort to use state law to crack down on a high-profile and well-connected scholar’s criticism of a Republican governor’s policies quickly lit up the liberal blogosphere on Friday, followed promptly by a blizzard of news articles.

I visited Cronon’s blog this morning, and it appears that this has indeed “gone viral” and could turn into a much bigger deal before it goes away.  Cronon said he’s had 2 million visitors in the last 24 hours, and there will be a New York Times Op-Ed on this whole issue on Monday.  And I guess the thing that is a little concerning for the likes of me, a simple professor at a simple university who also happens to run this web site as a hobby, is the clear effort to silence any sort of dissent and the highly agressive fight against academic freedom.

As far as I can tell, William Cronon is no Ward Churchill:  that is, his views–while liberal– are not “out there” on the fringe, and he has not been accused of plagiarism or some other kind of academic crime.  Here’s a guy who happens to be a prominent professor who started a blog criticizing the government, and the government decided they needed to after him.  That’s chilling and scary.

Which is one of the reasons why, btw, you can reach me at emutalk at gmail dot com