Category Archives: The Strike of 2006

And let the Faculty contract bargaining season begin!

Below is an email from EMU-AAUP president Susan Moeller about what is likely to be one of the major topics of negotiations this season, health care costs.  What else is new?  It sounds like the administration is trying to force a plan before negotiations proper begin; still, before the union reacts too negatively, perhaps we ought to see what the administration’s plan actually is all about.

Read on after the break.

Continue reading

EMU Football MAC Media Day Stuff

Also in non-strike EMU news (well, sort of) is the above video and this link to EMU’s Ron English (and a couple players) talking Media Day stuff with the MAC folks.

I say “non-strike” news, but it is hard for me not to flinch/remember the stuff that the EMU-AAUP has been saying about how much money we’re spending on football.  English starts talking about this at about the 3:20 point.  And then at the end of the video, English talks about how he’s going to talk with everyone who has anything to do with the players: the parking attendants, the secretaries, etc.  I wonder if he’ll talk to the faculty at all?

And I might be mis-remembering this entirely, but didn’t the previous football coach or previous athletic director come out with some kind of statement in favor of the faculty in the 2006 strike?

The mixed messages of faculty contract negotiations

It’s the beginning of what I guess I would refer to as “the silly season” for faculty contract negotiations, the time in the process where the language by both the faculty and the administration gets a little more shrill, a little more exasperated, a little more threatening and daring, where the idea of a strike gets mentioned.  It was this season that really launched EMUTalk.org four years ago, mainly because of the discussion that went on during August and September 2006 (here, here, here, here, and here) on my old “official” blog.  It’ll be interesting to look at those old posts in the next few days to see what’s similar and what’s different this time around.

One thing is for sure:  I’m not making any predictions one way or the other about us being on strike– my predictions are always wrong.

Anyway, I thought I’d kick off the month of August 2010 (well, sort of– I intended to post this a few days ago, but I’ve been busy with “life” and that pesky teaching thing) here at EMUTalk with some attention to the latest blog posts from the EMU-AAUP about negotiations. There’s no way to comment on them there (which is one of the reasons why it isn’t really a “blog”), so maybe folks can make some comments here.  More thoughts after the jump.

Continue reading

And so, how was the meeting?

Go ahead and comment if you have impressions of the faculty meeting today in Roosevelt Hall on the contract. Here’s a link to the EMU-AAUP’s web site with the unfortunate headline “Administration Accepts Fact-finding, But Has Unacceptably Weak Response on Domestic Partner Benefit Loss.” Even in settlement, it seems combative.

Personally, I think the administration– and the union, for that matter– find themselves between a rock and a hard place on domestic partner benefits created by some homophobic and hateful legislation and court rulings. However, I suspect that the MOUs that were brought by Elaine Martin here are about as good as we’re going to get. At least until this goes through the courts.

But hey, I wasn’t at the meeting today. What do those of you who were there think?

Wanted: EMUtalk correspondent for Monday’s faculty meeting

April is always the cruelest month.

Our son (my wife also teaches at EMU) is on his “spring break” right at pretty much the busiest time of the year at EMU, the last couple weeks of the winter term when everything is getting wrapped up, when there are various once a year functions, etc., etc.  Long story short, I won’t be able to attend the faculty union meeting on Monday.

So I’m looking for someone who a) is going to go to the meeting, b) is able to report back on it in a non-hyperbolic sort of way, and c) is not intensely tied to the union (e.g., Executive Committee members) to give us a report.  Let me know at sitedad at emutalk dot org.  I’ll post reports to the site and let the conversation continue.

Everybody hold your breath and cross your fingers…

… because today the faculty union and the administration are talking about the deal from fact finding. Let’s hope it all works out!

UPDATE:

Perhaps we have a deal?  This just in from Mullen speaking for Fallon:

MESSAGE TO THE UNIVERSITY COMMUNITY

On Monday, the university and the EMU Chapter of the AAUP received the
report of the fact finder.  Over the next four days, I worked with
others toward a comprehensive and systematic financial analysis of the
report’s recommendations, an assessment of its strategic implications
and a full understanding of the details.  In addition, I consulted with
key personnel on campus and the university’s Board of Regents.  Based
upon the sum of these actions, I am pleased to announce that the
administration will accept the fact finder’s recommendations for the
negotiations process.

This morning, members of the administration and AAUP bargaining teams
are working closely together on finalizing contract language.  I am
hopeful that a resolution will be reached soon, today if possible,
leading to a tentative agreement.

I look forward to working collaboratively to move the university forward
in service to its mission.  I will update you as developments occur.

Toward a stronger university,

John A. Fallon, III
President

Um, so does that mean we have a deal, or what?

Fallon speaks on WEMU this morning

EMU president John Fallon was on WEMU this morning, talking about a whole bunch of the ways that EMU has found itself in the news lately. I actually recorded it, but I didn’t think it was necessarily cool to put the whole thing up on this site. Hopefully, WEMU will post it sometime soon since Fallon does say a lot here that’s important. But here’s a bit of a recap of what I heard:

  • About fact-finding, Fallon said repeatedly “I’ve read the report and embrace it… it was done thoughtfully… I continue the process of consulting with others…I’m optimistic, and I feel good about where this is moving” etc. But when David Fair asked flat-out “Is there any reason now why we couldn’t get it (a contract, that is) done on Friday?” Fallon waffled. He said “Well, ah, I don’t see– I see this as a very auspicious development and, uh, I embrace it, I’m in the process of consulting with others, and, uh, I’m prepared to get this behind us and move forward.” So positive, but not exactly a “yes.” Oh, and it’s worth noting here that this is, as far as I can tell, the first public statement from anyone in the EMU administration about the fact finding report– well, beyond the first email that Fallon sent out.
  • He talked about working more with the faculty, etc., and then they talked about funding to EMU from the state. There’s going to a state legislature (the senate?) hearing on campus on April 23. Unsolicited piece of advice: schedule the meeting for some place in Pray-Harrold.  Pick any room you want, maybe a lecture hall.  DO NOT schedule it in the shiny-new Student Center or the not surprisingly well-kept chambers in Welch. Let the legislators see first hand what a dump much of this place is due to (in part) their unwillingness to fund improvements.
  • On the Laura Dickinson murder: when Fair asked if the university has been as open about the investigation as they should have been, Fallon began with “There are questions about this, and those questions have lead in fact toward the Butzel-Long investigation and now the DOE investigation.”  And he went on to point out that he’s all for the investigation, it’s the Board of Regents investigation, etc., etc.  Fair asked Fallon point-blank if he has been honest about all this and that he has not withheld information, and Fallon answered very quickly “Absolutely, without equivocation.”  Fair followed this up with questions about why Vick was on leave, and Fallon got a little more “no comment”-like, pointing that this was under investigation, some of the questions that needed to be addressed, etc., etc.  He also said that “I have been interviewed by a couple of different folks associated with this investigation.”  So, from my hearing of this, it seems that the story that Fallon is sticking to here is that he didn’t know what was going on with the Dickinson case until very late into the process.   It’ll be interesting to see how this investigation plays out, indeed.  Oh, btw– no apologies, as far as I can tell.
  • Fair wrapped up by asking Fallon to respond to the calls for him to be fired; not surprisingly, Fallon didn’t exactly have a stellar response to that:  “I want to focus on doing the right thing, that hasn’t changed, I want to be open and transparent,” etc., etc.

So, mark your calendars:  this Friday, we’ll find out just how serious the administration is (or isn’t) about settling the contract; April 23 there will be a hearing on campus about funding for higher ed in Michigan (a great picketing opportunity if the contract isn’t settled, in my opinion); and sometime in the near future, a series of investigations about the Dickinson murder will shed some light on what went wrong there, and also what the president knew and when did he know it.

Cal State system averts strike

I just heard on NPR that the California State University system faculty has agreed to a deal with the administration.  Here are the opening paragraphs from the “Inside Bay Area” web site, which is put out by the Oakland Tribune:

The union representing 24,000 California State University faculty members has agreed to a tentative contract that would hike professors’ pay nearly 25 percent over four years and avert a strike at the 417,000-student system.The agreement, announced Tuesday, must be ratified by union members and the Cal State Board of Trustees. The breakthrough came after two years of negotiations and just days before two-day walkouts were to begin on the system’s 23 campuses.

A strike would have been the largest in U.S. higher-education history. Faculty leaders said they would stall strike plans while the contract was being finalized.

Let’s hope that we get to something similar….

Cal State University delays strike

Cal State University has been in the news lately over an impending strike and contract negotiations. The story seems to mirror the circumstances at EMU in some ways, just further down the road in the process. They’ve been without a new contract since June of 2005. They also brought in a fact finder.

Travis portrayed the fact-finder’s proposals as “close enough” to the union’s previous demands and said the report could form the outlines of a pact. In complicated formulas, the report suggested salary raises totaling 24.87%, just short of the 25.2% the union sought. Additional merit and longevity raises would sweeten the plan.

However, they are still negotiating and have extended the contract for 10 more days. It’ll be interesting to see what comes of their situation.

Fact finding “ends,” though perhaps the real adventure is just beginning

EMU-AAUP President Howard Bunsis sent around information about the close of the fact finding process today. Before I get to what he wrote, let me mention the rally scheduled for Tuesday, March 20, at noon, outside by the fountain in front of Welch Hall. Someone from the UAW wrote me (I assume in my role as sitedad) and wondered if the AAUP leadership would have any objection to UAW participation in this rally. That strikes me as a good idea– after all, they don’t have a contract either– but I’m not really in a position to give the go-ahead on this.

So, AAUP leadership, meet the UAW leadership. UAW, this is the AAUP. I’ll let y’all exchange numbers on your own.

Anyway, here’s what Howard wrote:

Continue reading